HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Sagar Samaria, S/o Late Sh. Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Through Its Senior Divisional Manager, Divisional Office – Respondent
ORDER :
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:
“To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting the letters sated 27.01.2022 and 15.02.2022.
To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate basis on suitable post with all consequential basis with interest @ 18 percent annum.”
2. The brief facts of the case are that the father of petitioner, Shri Rakesh Kumar, died on 6.12.2021 when he was working as Higher Grade Assistant (HGA) with the respondent corporation (LIC). At the time of death, he was survived by his wife Manju Lata, two sons Karan and Sagar, and two daughters Sapna and Surbhi, besides parents of deceased. On 05.01.2022, the mother of petitioner submitted an application to grant compassionate appointment to petitioner in place of her deceased husband Rakesh Kumar. The respondents had declined the request of the petitioner vide letter dated 27.1.2022 on the premise that daughter of late Shri Rakesh Kumar, Ms. Surbhi is gainfully employed with the government. The case of petitioner is that Surbhi had been married on 29.12.2021 even
State of H.P. Vs. Abhishek Kumar
Sushma Gosain vs. Union of India
LIC vs. Shri Asha Ramchandara Abedkar and another
Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs. State of Haryana
State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr. vs. Dharam Bir
Dr. Preeti Srivastava and Anr. vs. State of M.P. and others
IG (Karmik) vs. Prahlad Mani Tripathi
General Manager, State Bank of India vs. Anju Jain
V. Sivamurthy vs. Union of India
Mumtaz Yunus Mulani vs. State of Maharashtra and others
State of Chhattisgarh vs. Dhirjo Kumar Sengar
Eastern Coalfields Limited vs. Anil Badyakar
Bhavani Prasad Sonkar vs. Union of India
State of Gujarat vs. Arvind Kumar T. Tiwari
N.C. Santosh vs. State of Karnataka
Compassionate appointment is not a right but a measure to assist families in financial distress, and is contingent on family employment status and compliance with rules.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right and must consider the financial condition of the deceased employee's family, which was not in distress in this case.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly following a breadwinner's death; delayed applications undermine their purpose.
Compassionate appointment is a concession, not a legal right, and requires compliance with specific provisions while emphasizing immediate application to demonstrate need.
Compassionate appointment is a discretionary relief based on the immediate financial needs of the family, requiring a thorough assessment of all income sources and benefits received.
Point of Law : As more than 30 years have passed since the father of the petitioner/appellant had expired, neither there is any useful purpose to issue any positive direction, nor the facts of the ca....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the application for compassionate appointment should be reasonable and proximate to the time of the death of the bread earner, and the process....
Compassionate appointment is not a right but a concession for immediate financial distress following a government employee's death, and cannot be claimed after significant delay.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions under the relevant scheme for compassionate appointment are mandatory in nature, and the subsequent declaration of Govind Praka....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.