SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3524

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Inderjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Japneet Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta and Mr. C. Prakash and Mr. Rishi, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
None, for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J. (Oral)--This petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India impugns the order dated 03.08.2023 passed by the Civil Judge-03, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (`Trial Court') in CS SCJ No. 891/2023, whereby the Trial Court declined the oral prayer made by the Petitioner for restoration of status quo passed in respect of the entire first floor as well as one shop at Ground Floor of property No. 24/14-B, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi (`suit property')

1.1. The Petitioner is the plaintiff and the Respondents are defendants in the civil suit. The civil suit was filed for the relief of mandatory injunction and permanent injunction.

2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Trial Court on 24.07.2023 had passed an order directing the parties to maintain status quo with respect to the suit property in the presence of counsel for the Respondent No. 2 i.e., defendant No. 2.

2.1. He states as on the date of passing of the status quo order, it is the stand of the Petitioner that the shop at ground floor of suit property was lying vacant and closed.

2.2. He states that the keys of the shop at ground floor of suit property were in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top