DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Usha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Anil Singh Kushwah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. plaintiff's arguments on property status (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis of status quo and evidence (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. conclusion dismissing the petition (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT
Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)
The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.
CM APPL. 3857/2022 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
This application stands disposed of.
CM (M) 76/2022
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, is directed against an order dated 18.02.2020 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-03, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in M-10975/2016 [Smt. Usha Rani vs. Sh. Anil Singh Kushwah]. By the impugned order, an application filed by the petitioner-plaintiff ["the plaintiff"] under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ["CPC"], alleging violation by the respondent-defendant ["the defendant"] of an interim order dated 08.07.2009 was dismissed.
Facts
2. The suit before the Trial Court was filed in the year 2009, wherein the plaintiff claimed a decree for possession of the suit p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.