SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Usha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Anil Singh Kushwah – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J. (Oral)

The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through video conferencing.

CM APPL. 3857/2022 (for exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

This application stands disposed of.

CM (M) 76/2022

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, is directed against an order dated 18.02.2020 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-03, East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in M-10975/2016 [Smt. Usha Rani vs. Sh. Anil Singh Kushwah]. By the impugned order, an application filed by the petitioner-plaintiff ["the plaintiff"] under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ["CPC"], alleging violation by the respondent-defendant ["the defendant"] of an interim order dated 08.07.2009 was dismissed.

Facts

2. The suit before the Trial Court was filed in the year 2009, wherein the plaintiff claimed a decree for possession of the suit property (A-596-597, Out of Khasra No. 411, situated in abadi of New Ashok Nagar, Delhi-110096) ["the property"].

3. On the plaintiff's application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC, an interim order dated 08.07.2009 was passed. The order, as extracted in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top