IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
Wasim Akram @ Raja Khan, s/o Abdul Kadir Khan - Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through PSO Darwha, Police Station Darwha, District Yavatmal – Respondent
Criminal Application (BA) No.285 of 2024 With Criminal Application (BA) No.1141 of 2023 With Criminal Application (BA) No.1179 of 2023
Decided On : 03-07-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail applications under ndps act. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of incomplete chargesheet. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. prosecution's requirement for fsl report compliance. (Para 6 , 7 , 13) |
| 4. arguments on the validity of chargesheet. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. statutory interpretation regarding ndps act. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. court's exploration of case law and statutory interpretation. (Para 19) |
| 7. incomplete chargesheet implications. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. decision on merits of bail applications. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 9. rejection of bail applications based on procedural compliance. (Para 38 , 39 , 49) |
ORDER :
Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J.
1. By these applications, being moved under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, applicants arrested on 18.5.2023 seek regular bail in connection with Crime No.401/2023 registered with the non-applicant police station for offences punishable under Sections 8 (b), 8(c), 21(c), and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the NDPS Act).
2. Heard learned counsel Shri S.P.Bhandarkar for applicants (in Criminal Application Nos.1141 and 1179/2023) and learned counsel Shri S.H.Sudame for applicant (in Criminal Application No.285/2024) and learned Additional Public Prosecutors Shri M.J.Khan and Ms.H.N.Prabhu for the State.
3. The accusations against applicants are on the basis of report lodged by Assistant Police Inspector Amol Krushnaji Mude, attached to the Darwha Police Station. As per his report, he received a secret information that contraband article “Mephedrone” is being transported in a white colour “Hyundai Verna Car” bearing registration No.MH-49/B/7082 and the said car is proceeding through “Samruddhi Mahamarg”. He immediately forwarded the said information to his superior i.e. Assistant Superintendent of Police and also Police Inspector, Darwha Police Station. He also called two panchas from the Panchayat Samiti Office at Darwha and also called a jeweller to weigh the contraband article. By carrying the sealing material, police officials proceeded towards spot of incident and intercepted the said car. In the said car, applicants were found. After giving their search and informing rights of applicants, under Section 50 of the NDPS Act, personal search of applicants was carried out. During the search of the said car, a box below dash board was found containing a brown colour envelope, which was opened in presence of panchas, in which “Mephedrone” powder weighing 150 grams was found. The net weight of the said mephedrone powder was 141 grams 600 miligrams. In presence of panchas, samples were obtained. Cash amount was also seized from applicants. It is also mentioned that they have kept provision for obtaining the samples in presence of the Magistrate in view of compliance under Section 52 of the NDPS Act. After a due compliance of the mandatory provision, they arrested applicants.
4. Learned counsel Shri S.P.Bhandarkar, submitted that the mandate of Section 36 -A(4) of the NDPS Act is not followed by the prosecution. Incomplete chargesheet is filed without FSL and Inventory Reports. Only the investigating agency filed applications under Section 36 -A(4) for extension of time. In fact, it is to be filed through the Public Prosecutor. Thus, the prosecution has not followed due mandate and no extension was sought after expiry of 180 days for placing on record the FSL Report. The FSL Report was filed on 15.2.2024. The applications filed by the Investigating Officer neither indicate progress of investigation nor indicate compelling reasons required for extension of custody beyond 180 days. The said applications show that the FSL Report is being filed under the garb of Section 173 (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The act done by the Investigating Officer frustrates procedural schemes laid down under the NDPS Act. He further submitted that a plain reading of proviso to Section 36 -A(4) indicates that the special court is required to consider applications filed by
Sanjay Kumar Kedia alias Sanjay Kedia vs. Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau and Anr
M.Ravindran vs. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Radhakrishnan and another vs. State by Inspector of Police, Kanniyakumari Police Station
Rakesh Sha vs. State of West Bengal
Tarsem Singh vs. State of Haryana
Sabarinath vs. State of Kerala
Opto Circuit India Limited vs. Axis Bank and ors
Sunil Vasantrao Phulbande vs. State of Maharashtra
Rafael Palafox Garcia vs. The Union of India and anr
State of Maharashtra vs. Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre
Balaji Vasantrao Suwarnkar vs. State of Maharashtra
Babu s/o Rakhmanji Khamkar and anr vs. The State of Maharashtra
Default bail – Once a charge-sheet is filed within stipulated time, question of default bail does not arise. It cannot be held that additional documents cannot be produced subsequently.
Point of Law : Section 173(8) of the Cr.P.C. directs further investigation in the matter.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the pending FSL report does not render the charge sheet incomplete, and the determination of the accused's involvement in the offence is a mat....
The absence of an FSL report does not render a chargesheet incomplete; the right to default bail ceases once a chargesheet is filed, regardless of pending investigations.
Default bail – Petitioner does not get a right to demand for enlargement on the ground of default bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. merely because charge-sheet/final report filed by Police after i....
The non-filing of FSL report with the challan does not vitiate the challan or entitle the applicant to default bail under section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
A Charge-Sheet filed without a Chemical Analysis Report can be deemed valid, shifting the bail determination to merits rather than procedural deficiencies once filed within statutory limits.
Non-filing of the FSL report along with the charge sheet does not render the charge sheet incomplete, and therefore, no right of default bail is accrued in favor of the accused.
The right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code is extinguished upon the filing of a supplementary charge-sheet with the required report and the Court taking cognizance.
The absence of an FSL report does not invalidate a charge sheet under NDPS Act, affirming the right to default bail remains linked to timely completion of investigations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.