IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is that criminal cases with predominantly civil flavor, especially those arising from matrimonial relationships, can be quashed if the possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, and continuation of the criminal case would cause oppression and prejudice to the accused.

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.93/2021 dated 07.04.2021, under Sections 324/34 IPC registered at PS I.P. Estate, Delhi including all proceedings arising therefrom, predicated on a settlement arrived at between the parties.

2. Respondent No. 2/Complainant is the brother-in-law of the Petitioners. A matrimonial dispute arose between Respondent No. 2 and sister of the Petitioners, pursuant to which she filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against Respondent No. 2 and his family members. With the intervention of friends and well wishers of both parties, matter was amicably settled in April, 2021 and sister of the Petitioners joined the company of Respondent No. 2 and has since been living happily with him.

3. Present FIR No.93/2021 was registered at the instance of Respondent No. 2 against the Petitioners on account of an alleged scuffle between them. Subsequently however, parties have settled all their disputes amicably and a Compromise Deed has been executed on 22.05.2023, recording the terms of compromise, a copy of which has been filed along with the petition. It is recorded in the Deed that Petitioners' sister has joined the company of Respondent No. 2 in April, 2021 and is living happily and parties do not want to prosecute the cross FIRs filed against each other. Be it noted that FIR No. 94/2021 has been registered at the instance of Petitioners' sister against Shri Wasim, brother of Respondent No. 2 and is subject matter of a separate petition being CRL. M.C. 6525/2023, in which the said FIR has been quashed by a separate order passed today. Present petition is restricted to quashing of FIR No. 93/2021.

4. Petitioners and Respondent No.2 are present in Court and have been identified by their respective counsels as well as Investigating Officer SI Naveen, PS I.P. Estate.

5. Respondent No. 2 states that since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, he has no objection if the FIR is quashed. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned APP for the State also has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

6. I have heard the learned counsels for the parties and the learned APP. Power of the Court to quash criminal proceedings on the basis of a settlement between the parties has been examined and delineated by the Supreme Court in a number of judgments. Emphasizing that the exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case, the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303, held that albeit the inherent power is of wide plentitude with no statutory limitation but must be exercised in accord with guidelines engrafted in such power viz.: to secure the ends of justice and to prevent abuse of process of any Court. The Supreme Court cautioned that heinous and serious offences of mental depravity or offences like murder, rape, dacoity etc. cannot be fittingly quashed, however, criminal cases having overwhelming and predominantly civil flavor stand on a different footing for the purposes of quashing, particularly, offences arising from commercial, civil disputes or those pertaining to matrimonial relationships etc. where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and parties have resolved their entire dispute. It was held thus:

"61. .... But the criminal cases having overwhelmingly and predominatingly civil flavour stand on a different footing for the purposes of quashing, particularly the offences arising from commercial, financial, mercantile, civil, partnership or such like transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony relating to dowry, etc. or the family disputes where the wrong is basically private or personal in nature and the parties have resolved their entire dispute. In this category of cases, the High Court may quash the criminal proceedings if in its view, b