IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Neena Bansal Krishna, JJ.
Shailesh Rathore - Appellant
Versus
Vartika Channa - Respondent
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 296 of 2023 & CM APPL. 51458 of 2023
Decided On : 05-10-2023
Condonation of delay - Code of Civil Procedure - The court allowed the applications for condonation of delay in re-filing the present appeal under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal to set aside an order for maintenance passed by the Family Court. The respondent wife was initially without income but later secured employment.
Finding of the Court:
The court modified the maintenance order, considering the change in the respondent's financial circumstances.
Issues: Condonation of delay, Maintenance order under Hindu Marriage Act
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the change in the respondent's financial circumstances and modified the maintenance order accordingly.
Final Decision: The court directed the appellant to pay reduced maintenance of Rs. 50,000 per month to the respondent wife and daughter, and disposed of the appeal and pending application.
JUDGMENT (Oral)
CM APPLs. 51461/2023, 51462/2023, 51463/2023 (Exemptions)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The applications are disposed of.
CM APPL. 51459/2023 (Condonation of delay)
3. The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 54 days' delay in re-filing the present appeal.
4. For the reasons and grounds stated in the present application, the application is allowed, the delay of 54 days in re-filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
5. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.
CM APPL. 51460/2023 (Condonation of delay)
6. The present application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed on behalf of the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of 16 days' delay in filing the present appeal.
7. For the reasons and grounds stated in the present application, the application is allowed, the delay of 16 days in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned.
8. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 296/2023
9. The present appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read with Section 19 of the Family Courts Act has been filed on behalf of the appellant to set aside the Order dated 20.05.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Patiala House Courts, Delhi, whereby the Application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed on behalf of the respondent/wife was allowed and the appellant/husband was directed to pay Rs. 79,800/- per month from June, 2020 to June, 2022 and Rs. 86,200/- per month from July, 2022 onwards, jointly to the respondent/wife and the daughter for their maintenance, also the aforesaid maintenance be increased by 2.5% every year starting from 01.04.2024.
10. Notice issued.
11. Ms. Tara Narula, learned counsel for the respondent/wife, accepts notice.
12. We have heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the material placed on record.
13. The respondent before the learned Trial Court has admitted to be drawing a salary of Rs. 2,06,000/- per month and the learned Trial Court after taking into consideration credit entries in different account has also taken income of the appellant as Rs. 2,00,000/- per month. The learned Family Court while passing the impugned Order has observed that at the time of filing the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the respondent was without any source of income and was fully dependent upon her father for her maintenance and that of her daughter. However, subsequently on 14.07.2022, the respondent got employment with Pradhan Airways and was drawing a salary of Rs. 34,016/- per month.
14. In view of above facts of circumstances, we hereby modify the Order dated 20.05.2023 and reduce the aforesaid maintenance amount to the extent that the appellant/husband is directed to pay Rs. 50,000/- per month to the respondent/wife and the daughter.
15. Accordingly, the present appeal along with pending application is disposed of.
The court has the discretion to condone delay in re-filing an appeal and may modify maintenance orders based on changed financial circumstances.
The court has the discretion to condone the delay in filing an appeal based on the reasons presented and can issue directions for the determination and payment of maintenance arrears.
The court prioritized voluntary settlement and highlighted the consequences of breaching settlement terms, including contempt of court.
In matrimonial disputes, a spouse's decrease in income is insufficient to evade maintenance obligations; earning by the other spouse does not negate this responsibility.
The court can condone the delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and facilitate voluntary divorce settlements under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
The reason for condoning delay must be bonafide and acceptable, and the length of delay alone is not a determining factor.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.