Back
TARA VITASTA GANJU
Mohd. Sayeed – Appellant
Versus
Anil Jain – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Tara Vitasta Ganju, J. (Oral) - The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/tenant impugning the order dated 21.09.2023 [hereinafter referred to as "Impugned Order"] passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi with respect to the premises i.e., shop bearing no.167-D, Gali Tehbar Khan, Naya Bans, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the `demised premises'], wherein the Leave to Defend/Contest Application of the Petitioner/tenant was dismissed.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant has returned with instructions. Learned Counsel submits that since the Petitioner/tenant is unable to pay the user and occupation charges/mesne profits, additional time of two months be granted to the Petitioner/tenant to vacate the premises beyond the statutory period permitted by law, and that the Petitioner/tenant will vacate the demised premises by 31.05.2024.
3. Learned Counsel for the Respondents/landlord, on instructions, from the Respondents/landlord confirms that this is acceptable to the Respondents/landlord.
4. Subject to the above, learned Counsel for the Respondents/landlord submits that the Respondents/landlord agree
The court has the discretion to grant additional time for the tenant to vacate the premises and may waive claims for use and occupation charges based on the parties' agreement.
Enforcement of tenant's Undertaking for vacating premises and paying use and occupation charges.
Enforcement of amicable settlements in tenant-landlord disputes and the consequences of non-compliance with settlement terms.
Court grants tenants time to vacate upon undertaking to pay rent and deliver possession without subletting.
The court upheld the validity of a compromise agreement between a tenant and landlord, establishing enforceable terms for possession and occupation charges, highlighting the significance of mutual co....
The court upheld the tenant's right to occupy the premises for a limited period, subject to compliance with specified conditions and obligations.
The court upheld previous judgments and mandated the petitioner to vacate the premises and settle arrears, emphasizing compliance with the undertaking.
The court upheld the orders of the Rent Tribunal and Rent Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing compliance with court orders regarding possession and payment of rent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
