IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Tara Vitasta Ganju, J.
Mohd. Sayeed - Appellant
Versus
Anil Jain & Anr. - Respondents
RC.REV. 341 of 2023 and CM No.61728 of 2023
Decided On : 14-12-2023
Tenant - Leave to Defend Application - The court granted the tenant additional time to vacate the premises and waived all claims for use and occupation of the demised premises, subject to the tenant filing an Affidavit of Undertaking.
Fact of the Case:
The tenant filed a Revision Petition against the order dismissing their Leave to Defend/Contest Application for the demised premises.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted the tenant additional time to vacate the premises and waived all claims for use and occupation of the demised premises, subject to the tenant filing an Affidavit of Undertaking.
Issues: Impugning the order dismissing the tenant's Leave to Defend/Contest Application, granting additional time to vacate the premises, and waiving claims for use and occupation charges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the tenant's inability to pay user and occupation charges, and the agreement between the parties to grant additional time and waive claims for use and occupation.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, with pending applications closed, and compliance scheduled for a later date.
JUDGMENT
Tara Vitasta Ganju, J. (Oral) - The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/tenant impugning the order dated 21.09.2023 [hereinafter referred to as "Impugned Order"] passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi with respect to the premises i.e., shop bearing no.167-D, Gali Tehbar Khan, Naya Bans, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as the `demised premises'], wherein the Leave to Defend/Contest Application of the Petitioner/tenant was dismissed.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant has returned with instructions. Learned Counsel submits that since the Petitioner/tenant is unable to pay the user and occupation charges/mesne profits, additional time of two months be granted to the Petitioner/tenant to vacate the premises beyond the statutory period permitted by law, and that the Petitioner/tenant will vacate the demised premises by 31.05.2024.
3. Learned Counsel for the Respondents/landlord, on instructions, from the Respondents/landlord confirms that this is acceptable to the Respondents/landlord.
4. Subject to the above, learned Counsel for the Respondents/landlord submits that the Respondents/landlord agrees to waive all claims for use and occupation of the demised premises.
5. In view of the aforegoing, the Petitioner/tenant shall within one week file an Affidavit of Undertaking that:
(i) The Petitioner/tenant shall hand over the physical possession of the demised premises, on or before 31.05.2024;
(ii) The Petitioner/tenant undertakes and confirms that the entire demised premises is under his occupation and control;
(iii) The Petitioner/tenant will pay all the utility bills such as electricity and water and any other dues, for the demised premises till the date of handing over of the vacant, physical and peaceful possession thereof;
(iv) The Petitioner/tenant undertakes that they will not create any third party rights or part with possession of the demised premises and that they shall not damage the demised premises in any manner whatsoever prior to its vacation;
(v) The Petitioner/tenant shall remain bound by the aforesaid Undertaking.
6. An advance copy of the Undertaking shall be served on the Respondent/landlord.
7. Subject to the Petitioner/tenant filing the aforesaid Undertaking before this Court within one week from today, the execution of order dated 21.09.2023 shall remain stayed.
8. In the event that the Petitioner/tenant defaults in complying with the terms of the Undertaking filed, the interim protection granted hereinabove shall automatically stand dissolved and the Respondents/landlord will be at liberty to take appropriate steps as per law for recovery of possession and take appropriate steps to recover use and occupation charges from the Petitioner/tenant.
9. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. All pending applications shall stand closed.
10. List for compliance on 08.01.2024.
11. Parties shall act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.
The court has the discretion to grant additional time for the tenant to vacate the premises and may waive claims for use and occupation charges based on the parties' agreement.
Enforcement of tenant's Undertaking for vacating premises and paying use and occupation charges.
Enforcement of amicable settlements in tenant-landlord disputes and the consequences of non-compliance with settlement terms.
Court grants tenants time to vacate upon undertaking to pay rent and deliver possession without subletting.
The court upheld the validity of a compromise agreement between a tenant and landlord, establishing enforceable terms for possession and occupation charges, highlighting the significance of mutual co....
The court upheld the tenant's right to occupy the premises for a limited period, subject to compliance with specified conditions and obligations.
The court upheld previous judgments and mandated the petitioner to vacate the premises and settle arrears, emphasizing compliance with the undertaking.
The court upheld the orders of the Rent Tribunal and Rent Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing compliance with court orders regarding possession and payment of rent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.