Manu Rishi Garg vs V. K. Vashisht - 2024 Supreme(UK) 160

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(UK) 160

VIVEK BHARTI SHARMA
Manu Rishi Garg – Appellant
Versus
V. K. Vashisht – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Nikhil Singhal.
For the Respondent:Mr. S.K. Jain, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Amar Murti Shukla and Mr. Siddhartha Jain.

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.

By means of present writ petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, petitioner seeks to quash the judgment/order 26.07.2022 passed by Prescribed Authority/Second Additional Senior Civil Judge, Dehradun in PA Case No.22 of 2015 “Sri V.K. Vashisht and Ors. vs. Smt. Leelawati and Ors.” as well as the judgment/order dated 30.04.2023 passed by 8th Additional District Judge, Dehradun in RCA No.19 of 2022, whereby the release application filed by the respondents/landlords has been allowed and the appeal filed there against by the petitioner/tenant has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for both the parties would submit that this writ petition may be disposed of at the admission stage today itself as the parties have arrived at a compromise on the following conditions:-

(i) That, the petitioner/tenant shall vacate and handover actual physical possession of the shop in question to the respondent/landlord within two years from today.

(ii) That the petitioner/tenant shall pay a sum of Rs.2000/- per month to the respondents/landlord as use and occupation charges by 7th of every month.

(iii) That the rent already deposited by the petitioner/tenant sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document