IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, Tara Vitasta Ganju, JJ.
V. R. Industries Private Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Kejriwal - Respondent
FAO (COMM) 20 of 2024 CM APPL. 5693 of 2024 CM APPL. 5694 of 2024 CM APPL. 5695 of 2024
Decided On : 31-01-2024
Trademark Dispute - Commercial Court Order - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - [Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC] - [Registration No.ClassGoods155707201, 155707330, 155901129, 1771003, 1807096, 1837302, 2142928, 2142929, 2280431, 2280432, 2366744, 2759158, 2759159] - The court discussed the use and registration of the trademark 'GOLDEN GATE' by the respondent and the appellant, the opposition to the registration, prior use, and the balance of convenience in favor of the respondent. The court also referred to legal principles related to delay, concurrent user, and discretion in granting interlocutory injunctions.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent claimed prior use and registration of the trademark 'GOLDEN GATE' and sought an injunction against the appellant's use of a similar trademark. The appellant contested the suit on grounds of non-use, delay, and clean hands.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent established a prima facie case of prior use and registration of the trademark 'GOLDEN GATE' and that the balance of convenience favored the respondent. The court rejected the appellant's contentions regarding non-use, delay, and clean hands.
Issues: Prior use and registration of the trademark, delay, clean hands, and balance of convenience.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on evidence of prior use and registration, rejected the appellant's contentions, and considered legal principles related to delay, concurrent user, and discretion in granting interlocutory injunctions.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the court clarified that the observations made in the order were only for the purpose of considering the appellant's challenge to the interim order. The Commercial Court was directed to decide the suit uninfluenced by the observations in the order.
JUDGMENT
Vibhu Bakhru, J. (Oral)
1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 18.11.2023 (hereafter `the impugned order') passed by the learned Commercial Court in CS (Comm) No. 3752/2021 captioned Rajesh Kejriwal v. M/s. V.R. Industries Private Limited & Anr..
2. By the impugned order the learned Commercial Court had allowed the respondent's application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter `the CPC') and had restrained the appellant (arrayed as defendant in the suit) or its authorized agents from infringing/using the trademark "GOLDEN GATE" or any other trademark/label/name identical with or deceptively similar to the said trademark.
3. The respondent claims that it is carrying on business under the trading name of M/s Chemical Centre (India) at 139-Tilak Bazar, Khari Boali, Delhi-110006. The respondent claims that it deals in imports, processing and trading in various goods including industrial chemicals for use in the Food Industry, Sugar Industry, Paper Industry, Textile Industry and for preserving food stuffs and artificial resins. In addition, respondent also claims it deals in dry fruits, spices, essences and flavours, baking products, tea, yeast, sugar, confectionery, food grains, sauces, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jellies, jams, fruit sauces, milk and dairy products since inception.
4. It was the respondent's case that it has been using trademark "GOLDEN GATE" since 01.01.2006. It had applied for registration of the trademark in the year 2007 under Classes 1, 29 and 30. The said registration was granted and there is no dispute that the trademark "GOLDEN GATE" is registered in favour of the respondent. The details of the said registrations are as under:
| Registration No. | Class | Goods |
| 1557072 | 01 | Chemicals used in Industry, Food Industry, Sugar Industry, Paper Industry, Textile Industry, Artificial Resins and for preserving Food Stuffs Industry |
| 1557073 | 30 | All kinds of spices, salt and pepper, essences and flavours, baking products, tea, yeast, sugar, confectionery, pulses, food gram, sauces, vinegar. |
| 1559011 | 29 | Meat, Fish, Poultry and Game, Meat Extract, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jellies, jams, fruit sauces, eggs, Milk and other dairy products, edible oils and fats, Preserves, pickles, non-vegetarian preparations and other items falling in Class 29. |
5. The appellant also adopted the trademark "GOLDEN GATE" and claims it has been using the same since the year 2009. The appellant is engaged in the business of food products such as Cornflakes, Chocolate Cereals, Muesli, Nutrition Bars, Oats, Premium Nuts and Snacks comprising of Roasted and Masala Peanuts, Almonds, Cashew Nuts, Chana etc. The appellant also claims that it is dealing in items such as Detergent Powder, Detergent Cake, Floor Cleaner, Liquid Dish Wash, Toilet Cleaner, etc.
6. The appellant claims that it had applied for the registration of the trademark "GOLDEN GATE" as well as device mark in the year 2009 and thereafter. The first application was filed on 05.01.2009 on a `proposed to be used' basis. A tabular statement indicating the applications made by the appellant for registration of the trademark "GOLDEN GATE" is set out below:
| Trademark | Application No. and Date of Filing | Class | Goods | STATUS |
| GOLDEN GATE | 1771003 dated 05.01.2009 | 29 | Nuts, almonds, cashew nuts, walnuts, peanuts raisins, pistachio, dry fruits, protein bars. | Opposed |
| GOLDEN GATE | 1807096 dated 15.04.2009 | 32 | Mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages. | Opposed |
| GOLDEN GATE CHOCOCHAMP | 1837302 dated 07.07.2009 | 30 | Corn flakes and breakfast cereals | Opposed |
| GOLDEN GATES | 2142928 dated 11.05.2011 | 29 | Chickpeas; cuminseeds flavoured chickpeas; asafoetida flavoured chickpeas; chana; jeera flavoured chana: hing flavoured chana | Opposed |
| 2142929 da | ||||
The judgment established the importance of prior use and registration of trademarks, considerations of delay, concurrent user, and discretion in granting interlocutory injunctions.
Injunction – Grant or refusal of interim injunction is absolutely discretionary power of Commercial Court keeping in mind material available before it.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appellant had a prima facie case against the respondent for trademark infringement, and the Trial Court's findings were contrary to the fa....
The use of a mark that is phonetically similar and conveys the same idea as a registered trademark constitutes infringement, irrespective of packaging dissimilarity, as it likely confuses consumers o....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the protection of registered trademarks, the establishment of goodwill and reputation, and the likelihood of confusion among consumers in passin....
A registered trademark must be protected against infringement if it has established goodwill, even in the face of claims regarding dissimilarity of packaging.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.