Back
JYOTI SINGH
Meiden T&d India Limited – Appellant
Versus
Pci Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and factual background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. dispute arises from business relationships and contractual obligations (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments regarding jurisdiction and claims of set-off. (Para 12 , 13 , 18 , 20) |
| 4. disputes around the sfa and service charges obligations. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's analysis on validity and merits of the arbitration decision. (Para 19 , 29 , 35) |
| 6. courts should avoid reassessment of arbitration evidence. (Para 21 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. final observations and dismissal of the petition. (Para 50 , 51 , 52) |
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. - This petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the `1996 Act') on behalf of the Petitioner, laying a challenge to the arbitral award dated 11.07.2022 and additional award dated 31.08.2022 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator whereby an amount of Rs.1,95,48,107/- has been awarded in favour of the Respondent including pendente lite interest till the date of filing of the instant petition on 28.11.2022. Petitioner herein was the Respondent and Respondent herein was the Claimant before the Arb
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
