Back
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Rema Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Mahinder Lal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual details of petitioners and respondents (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. ownership history and disputes over suit property (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. civil suit initiated by respondent for partition (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments regarding rejection of plaint and ownership claim. (Para 11 , 19) |
| 5. arguments raised by the petitioners against the dismissal of their application (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. legal standards for dismissal of plaint under order vii rule 11 (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. scope of section 115 of the cpc in revision petitions (Para 44 , 46 , 59) |
| 8. discussion on requirements for cause of action in partition claims. (Para 52 , 63 , 72) |
| 9. court's reasoning on the absence of a valid title to pursue a partition. (Para 58 , 66) |
| 10. court's directive concerning jurisdiction and dismissal of suits (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 70 , 84) |
| 11. conclusion of the case and implications of the ruling (Para 86 , 87 , 88 , 89) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
1. The instant civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter "CPC") has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking the following reliefs:
"(A) Pass appropriate order(s) or direction(s) thereby settin
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
