Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
3. On the last date of hearing i.e., on 20th February, 2024 this Court had directed the Delhi Police to conduct an investigation and submit a detailed report stating as to who were the persons responsible for the incident that took place on the intervening night of 27/28th January, 2024 within the Kalkaji mandir premises as a result of which several got injured and one women passed away. The Delhi Police has filed its status report pursuant to order dated 20th February, 2024. The said status report reads as under:
"It is submitted that in the intervening night of 27/28.01.2024 at 12.41 am, a PCR call vide GD No. 11A was received at Police Station, Kalkaji, Delhi regarding collapse of stage at Kalkaji temple during Jagran. After the call the IO/SI Sushil Kumar reached the spot incident and the injured persons were shifted to different hospitals. Subseqeuntly, crime team also visited the spot and took photographs of the place of incident. Meanwhile, information was receive
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for permissions from the Administrator for organizing events within the Mandir precincts and the importance of continuing the redev....
The court mandates the appointment of an Independent Administrator for effective management and redevelopment of a temple amidst ongoing disputes and critical hygiene issues affecting devotees.
Once the unauthorized occupants, unauthorized constructions and encroachments are removed, within the next one week, steps shall be initiated towards re-development of the entire Mandir and the compl....
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of accommodating the interests of pujaris and baridaars in the redevelopment process and ensuring their active participation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for ongoing progress in the demarcation process, proper placement of street vendors, resolution of redevelopment issues, and conducting a ....
Unauthorized encroachment on temple premises is impermissible, mandating removal and establishment of safety measures for public devotees.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to issue directions for the regulation and management of religious premises, removal of unauthorized encroachments, and pr....
Unauthorized occupation of religious premises is illegal; the Court mandates removal to ensure redevelopement for public safety.
Court emphasized the authority of the Administrator in managing religious premises, focusing on the removal of unauthorized occupants and the proper structuring of redevelopment plans.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
