IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma - Respondent
FAO 36 of 2021, CM APPLs. 57032 of 2023 & 57033 of 2023 CM APPLs. 2914 of 2021, 10442 of 2021, 10444 of 2021, 20904 of 2021, 23819 of 2021, 25868 of 2021, 25869 of 2021, 25870 of 2021, 25884 of 2021, 25885 of 2021, 26495 of 2021, 29121 of 2021, 38063 of 2021, 38289 of 2021, 39643 of 2021, 43944-46 of 2021, 3172 of 2022, 3455 of 2022, 5641 of 2022,
Decided On : 12-03-2024
Kalkaji Mandir - Jagran Incident - CrPC 161, CrPC 41A, SLP (C) Diary No.9073/2022, SLP (C) Nos.010688-010689/2022, SLP (C) 011140-011141/2022, SLP (C) 013726-013728/2022, LPA No.172/2022 - The court discussed the incident at Kalkaji Mandir, where a jagran event led to a collapse of a stage resulting in injuries and a fatality. The court analyzed the negligence of the organizers, permissions obtained, and the role of the Mahant and the Administrator in managing the premises. The legal provisions of CrPC 161 and 41A were referenced in the investigation. Additionally, the judgment referred to various Supreme Court orders related to the redevelopment of the Mandir, emphasizing the importance of orderly redevelopment without impediments.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved an incident at Kalkaji Mandir where a jagran event led to a stage collapse causing injuries and a fatality. The court analyzed the negligence of the organizers, permissions obtained, and the role of the Mahant and the Administrator in managing the premises.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the organizers were negligent in regulating the movement of people on the platform, and permissions for the event were obtained from the Mahant, despite the Administrator having full management and control of the Mandir premises. The court also highlighted the ongoing redevelopment of the Mandir and the importance of continuing the redevelopment without impediments.
Issues: The issues revolved around the negligence of the organizers, permissions obtained from the Mahant, and the role of the Administrator in managing the Mandir premises.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that no program shall be organized within the Mandir precincts without permission from the Administrator, and highlighted the importance of continuing the redevelopment of the Mandir without any impediments.
Final Decision: The court directed the police to continue the investigation and conclude it expeditiously, taking action against all persons who are culpable. Additionally, the court emphasized the importance of continuing the redevelopment of the Mandir without any impediments.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) - This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.
3. On the last date of hearing i.e., on 20th February, 2024 this Court had directed the Delhi Police to conduct an investigation and submit a detailed report stating as to who were the persons responsible for the incident that took place on the intervening night of 27/28th January, 2024 within the Kalkaji mandir premises as a result of which several got injured and one women passed away. The Delhi Police has filed its status report pursuant to order dated 20th February, 2024. The said status report reads as under:
"It is submitted that in the intervening night of 27/28.01.2024 at 12.41 am, a PCR call vide GD No. 11A was received at Police Station, Kalkaji, Delhi regarding collapse of stage at Kalkaji temple during Jagran. After the call the IO/SI Sushil Kumar reached the spot incident and the injured persons were shifted to different hospitals. Subseqeuntly, crime team also visited the spot and took photographs of the place of incident. Meanwhile, information was received from different hospitals regarding MLCs of 16 victims who have sustained injuries in the said incident out of which one lady aged about 55 years was declared brought dead at MAX Hospital, Saket. Later on, the deceased was identified as Teena (aged-55 yrs) w/o Ved Prakash r/o Tuglakabad Extension, Govindpuri, Delhi.
xxx
6. As per the statements of witnesses recorded u/s 161 CrPC, it has been found that the incident had taken place due to the negligence of the organizers of the Jagran. The statements of singers Arjun Suri and Rahul Banjara were recorded in which they stated that they were contacted by one Satish Kumar and Anuj Mittal to perform in the said event. Later on, statement of Rajesh Khurana, the owner of Rama Tent Decorators was also recorded who stated that he was contacted by Satish Kumar and Anuj Mittal for installing the main stage and tent at the said event. He further stated that the elevated platform which had collapsed on the date of incident was installed by one Aviram Patra, the owner of ANK Innovation on the request of the organizers. It was found that the event was organized by Shri Kalkaji Sajja Sewadar Mitr Mandal (SKSSMM) and Anuj Mittal is its president. Subsequently, notices u/s 41A CrPC were served upon Anuj Mittal and Satish Kumar and both the accused persons were arrested on 30.01.2024 after interrogation and were released on bail. The invitation card for the said event was obtained from the accused person Anuj Mittal, President of SKSSMM and the same was seized. Subsequently, Sh. Aviram Patra was interrogated who stated that the said platform was installed by him on the request of the organizers Anuj Mittal and Satish Kumar and the same was made only for 20-25 people to seat there. That no chairs were put on the elevated platform. He further stated that a trial was conducted by him in which it was found that the said platform would bear the weight of approximately 50 persons and that when the incident had occurred, he was present at the said event and that more than 100 hundred persons had climbed on the platform and efforts were made to disperse the crowd from the sad platform. He had also requested Anuj Mittal and Satish Kumar to control the crowd but no heed was paid to the said request.
7. The organizers have stated that they had obtained verbal permission to use the premises for the event from Mahant of Kalkaji Mandir and on their request, Sh. Surender Nath Avdhoot through his representative Yogi Abhinav Nath had requested the DGM, BSES, Nehru Place, Delhi vide letter dated 19/12/2023 (Copy enclosed) to provide temporary electricity meter for Chowki/Jagran purpose at Mahant Niwas Parisar from 19.12.2023 till 28.01.2024 in the name of Society Shri Kalkaji Sajja Sewadar Mitr Mandal During investigation, the details rega
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for permissions from the Administrator for organizing events within the Mandir precincts and the importance of continuing the redev....
The court mandates the appointment of an Independent Administrator for effective management and redevelopment of a temple amidst ongoing disputes and critical hygiene issues affecting devotees.
Once the unauthorized occupants, unauthorized constructions and encroachments are removed, within the next one week, steps shall be initiated towards re-development of the entire Mandir and the compl....
Court upheld the importance of managing and redeveloping temple premises while balancing the interests of stakeholders involved, ensuring proper representation and administration of the site.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of accommodating the interests of pujaris and baridaars in the redevelopment process and ensuring their active participation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for ongoing progress in the demarcation process, proper placement of street vendors, resolution of redevelopment issues, and conducting a ....
Unauthorized encroachment on temple premises is impermissible, mandating removal and establishment of safety measures for public devotees.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to issue directions for the regulation and management of religious premises, removal of unauthorized encroachments, and pr....
Unauthorized occupation of religious premises is illegal; the Court mandates removal to ensure redevelopement for public safety.
Court emphasized the authority of the Administrator in managing religious premises, focusing on the removal of unauthorized occupants and the proper structuring of redevelopment plans.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.