Neeta Bhardwaj vs Kamlesh Sharma

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Del) 3591

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Neeta Bhardwaj – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Sharma – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. R.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Ms. Alpana Pandey, Mr. Siddharth Bhardwaj, Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Mr. Rahul Bhardwaj and Mr. Lakshay Bhardwaj, Advocates.
Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh & Ms. Sonia Singhania, Advocates, for the DDA.
Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj & Mr. Rahul Bhardwaj, Advocates.
Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Kush Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Ms. Samapika Biswal and Mr. Aman Kumar Yadav, Advocates, for the Ld. Administrator.
Mr. Luv Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Siddharth Panda and Mr. Ritank, Advocates, for the MCD.
Mr. Thakur Sumit, Advocate.
Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Ishkaran Singh, Advocate for 19 shopkeepers.
Mr Prabhas Chandra, Advocate.
Mr. R.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Rajmangal Kumar.
Mr. Goonmeet Singh, Architect.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, SHO.
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for Unregistered Vendors.
Mr. S. Sasibhushan, Advocate.
Mr. Sarvesh Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. Vipul Gaur, Advocate.
Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Advocate for DUSIB.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate.
Mr Anuroop PS, Advocate.
Mr. Aly Mirza and Mr. Parbhash Kumar, Advocates.
Mr. Aditya, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Kailash Kumar Jha, Mr. Raghunath Pathak and Ms. Shivalika, Advocates.
Mr. Akarshan Bhardwaj and Ms. Garima Anand, Advocates
Mr. Amit Kumar Yadav and Mr. Anil Kumar Patwari, Advocates.
Mr Rishabh Kapur, Advocate.
Mr. Manik Dogra, Mr. Saurabh Chadda, Mr. Rohit Bhagat and Mr. Dhruv Pande, Advocates
Mr. Puneet Jain, Advocate with Mr. Umang Mehta, Advocate.
Mr. Sharique Hussain, Advocate.
Mrs. Alpana Pandey Advocate.
Mr. Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate.
Mr. Kumar Abhinandan, Advocate.
Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr Advocate With Mr. R.R. Kumar and Mr. Saurav Kumar Advocates in CM 28363/2023.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters.

3. The 12th Report of the ld. Administrator has been received today.

Demarcation

4. The process of demarcation of the land belonging to the Kalkaji Mandir has been ongoing under the supervision of this Court and various directions has been passed by the Court from time to time. On 6th July, 2023, the Court had constituted a committee consisting of DDA, and MCD officials as also two representatives of pujaris/baaridars to supervise the demarcation.

5. On the issue of demarcation, the ld. Administrator has reported that regular meetings were held in the office of the SDM and weekly meetings have been held at the office of the ld. Administrator. The status of the demarcation as per the last meeting dated 21st August, 2023 is as under:

"16. In terms of the directions of the undersigned, regular meetings have been held at the office of the SDM, and weekly meetings have been held at the office of the undersigned, every Monday. As per the last minutes of meeting dated 21.08

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Del) 3591

PRATHIBA M. SINGHNeeta Bhardwaj – AppellantVersusKamlesh Sharma – Respondent

Related Judgments