IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Ganga Sagar & Co. P. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Ujval Singh Suri - Respondent
CO.APPL. 692 of 2023 in Cr.O. (CO.) 9 of 2004 and CO.PET. 323 of 2000 & CO.APPL. 674 of 2023, OLR 280 of 2019
Decided On : 26-09-2023
Companies Act - Dissolution of Company - Section 481 - Section 454 - Section 555 - Meghal Homes (P) Ltd Vs Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti and Ors., (2007) 7 SCC 753
Fact of the Case:
The Official Liquidator filed an application under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking dissolution of the company in liquidation, Ganga Sagar & Company (P) Ltd.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the company's affairs had been completely wound up, and there were no further assets to realize any money for the company. The court permitted the Official Liquidator to deposit the remaining claim amount with the Reserve Bank of India as unclaimed dividend and dissolved the company.
Issues: The issues involved the winding up of the company, disbursement of admitted claims, and the dissolution of the company under the Companies Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Meghal Homes (P) Ltd Vs Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti and Ors., (2007) 7 SCC 753, which allowed for the dissolution of a company when its affairs have been completely wound up or when the Official Liquidator cannot proceed with the winding up due to lack of funds or other reasons.
Final Decision: The company, Ganga Sagar & Company (P) Ltd, was dissolved, and the Official Liquidator was discharged. The court also disposed of all pending applications.
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CA No. 674/2023 in CO.PET. 323/2000
2. This is an application which has been filed on behalf of the Official Liquidator under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying that the company in liquidation, i.e., Ganga Sagar & Company (P) Ltd be dissolved and the Official Liquidator be discharged as its Liquidator.
3. The Official Liquidator was appointed as the Liquidator of Ganga Sagar & Company (P) Ltd., [hereinafter `Company (In Liqn.)'] vide order dated 20th August, 2002. The citations were published in the newspapers namely The Statesman, which is published in English and Dainik Jagran which is published in Hindi on 14th September, 2003 and also in the Delhi Gazette on 24th October, 2003.
4. It is submitted that the concerned official from the office of the Official Liquidator (OL) visited the registered office of the Company (In Liqn.) at 6, Tilak Marg, New Delhi, on 4th August, 2003. However, the possession of the same was not taken over as it was informed by the Estate Manager at the said premises, that no company by the name of Ganga Sagar & Co. Pvt. Ltd existed at the said address.
5. The concerned officials from the office of the Official Liquidator are also stated to have visited the factory of the Company (In Liqn.) at 69-70, Pitampur Industrial Area, Sector-I, District Dhar, M.P on 9th August, 2003. It is stated that the possession of the same also could not be taken over as the same had been auctioned by MPFC, Indore on 12th September, 2001 to Ms/ Gatiman Auto Pvt. Ltd. It is also claimed that none of the Ex-Directors of the Company (In Liqn.), i.e., Mr. Ujval Sagar Suri and Mr. Narinder Suri, have filed the Statement of Affairs within 21 days as required, therefore, the Official Liquidator filed a Criminal Compliant being Crl. O. No. 9/2004 under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956.
6. In the present application, on behalf of the OL, it is submitted that vide order dated 11th October, 2012, the ex-directors Mr. Ujval Sagar Suri and Mr. Narinder Suri, were directed to deposit Rs.44,14,214.17, i.e., the amount which was to be recovered by the Company (In Liqn.). The said order was also upheld by a ld. Division Bench of this Court in order dated 20th August, 2014 in CO.APP. 6/2013 titled Ujval Sagar Suri v. Ganga Sagar & Co. Pvt. Ltd. As per the present application, the said amount has been deposited with the office of the OL.
7. In compliance with order dated 16th March, 2016 and 15th September, 2017, notice inviting claims was published in the newspapers namely The Statesman, the Delhi edition, which is published in English and in the Dhar and Indore edition of Dainik Jagran which is published in Hindi on 3rd January, 2018 and the last date for submitting the claims was 26th January, 2018.
8. On behalf of the OL, it is submitted that in response to the said claim notice, only one claim of Madhya Pradesh Financial Corporation (MPFC), AB Road, Indore, was received and the same was admitted and an admission letter dated 7th May, 2019 was issued to MPFC. It is further submitted that the EPFO had already filed their claim on 28th April, 2005, and the said claim was admitted for an amount of Rs.21,30,096/- and admission notice dated 2nd February, 2023 was sent.
9. The OL claims that after deduction of liquidation expenses of Rs.30,73,538.10 the office of the OL only had funds available to disburse the entire admitted claim of only the EPFO. Vide order dated 27th April, 2023, the Official Liquidator was permitted to disburse the amount of Rs.21,30,096/- to EPFO. However, the said amount could not be disbursed to EPFO as the necessary bank details and indemnity bonds were not submitted by them despite the Official Liquidator sending letters and reminders dated 12.05.2023, 11.07.2023 & 21.08.2023. The Official Liquidator is seeking permission to deposit Rs.21,30,096/-, towards the claim of EPFO with the Reserve Bank of India under section 5
Meghal Homes (P) Ltd Vs Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti and Ors.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the court to dissolve a company when its affairs have been completely wound up or when the Official Liquidator cannot proceed w....
The court can order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, when the affairs of the company have been completely wound up or the Official Liquidator cannot proceed ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the dissolution of a company in liquidation.
The court can order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 when the Official Liquidator cannot proceed with the winding up of the company due to lack of funds or as....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the Court to order the dissolution of a company when the Official Liquidator is unable to realize any assets to pay off the com....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the dissolution of a company when it is just and reasonable in the circumstances o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing for the dissolution of a company when the affairs have been ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, a company can be dissolved when the affairs of the company have been completely wound up or when....
The court can order the dissolution of a company under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 when the affairs of the company have been completely wound up or when the Official Liquidator cannot proc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.