SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Del) 869

JYOTI SINGH
T. K. ROY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI UNIVERSITY – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ranjay Roy
For the Respondent: Anurag Mathur

JUDGMENT :

JYOTI SINGH, J.

1. This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of order dated 24/30.12.2003 passed by Respondent No. 1/University of Delhi (‘University’), whereby the representation of the Petitioner dated 06.06.2003 has been rejected. Writ of mandamus is sought for a direction to the University to grant promotion to the Petitioner to the post of Technical Officer (‘TO’) from the date of eligibility with consequential effect in computation of retiral benefits.

2. Case of the Petitioner as set out in the writ petition is that Petitioner was appointed as Research and Reference Assistant (‘RRA’), a post equivalent to Senior Technical Assistant (‘STA’) on 01.03.1973 in the Department of Geography, University and was allegedly the senior-most STA at the relevant time in the Department. On 14.01.1993, University notified the upgraded post of TO in the Department. A memorandum was issued by the Department on 07.04.1993 calling upon the Petitioner for submitting the self-assessment form on or before 15.04.1993 so that his case could be considered for promotion as TO and no other person was asked t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top