SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Kiran Gupta – Appellant
Versus
University of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. promotion eligibility and timeline requirements. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. arguments for retrospective promotion based on eligibility. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. court's analysis of promotion criteria under ugc regulations. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. final order allowing petitions and retrospective promotion. (Para 21)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. (ORAL)--As identical issues arise for consideration in these three writ petitions, they are decided through this common order.

2. In substance, the prayer of the petitioners in these petitions is that they should be promoted to the post of Professor from the post of Associate Professor with effect from their date of eligibility and not from the date of interview i.e. June 25, 2019.

3. For a decision in the writ petitions, it is necessary to note certain facts in each of the writ petitions and the same shall be narrated separately.

FACTS IN W.P.(C) 10564/2019

4. The petitioner was appointed as a Lecturer on ad-hoc basis in the year 1986 in the Faculty of law, University of Delhi on August 04, 1992. After meeting all the requirements of the University of Delhi, the petitioner was absorbed as a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top