SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
A.K.SIKRI, VIPIN SANGHI
Pintoo Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to impugn the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (Tribunal) passed in OA No.3203/2002 dated 21.2.2003 and in RA No.63/2003 on 3.4.2003 whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the aforesaid OA and RA filed by the petitioners.

2. The petitioners had approached the Tribunal since they apprehended discontinuation of their services on the expiry of the contractual period of their engagement by the respondents, and therefore sought the quashing of the order dated 27.11.2002 whereby it was decided not to give extension to them after expiry of the contractual period on 10.12.2002. The petitioners had also staked a claim for regularisation of their services.

3. A commission of enquiry known as Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Enquiry was set up on 16.12.92 to enquire into the demolition of the Ram Janam Bhoomi Babri Masjid at Ayodhya. The initial tenure of the Commission was three years, but due to various complications the assignment of the Commission was not completed and its term has been extended from time to time. The peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top