SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.K.JAIN
Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha – Appellant
Versus
Biju – Respondent


JUDGMENT

V.K. Jain, J. (Oral)--This is a suit for permanent injunction, rendition of accounts and damages and delivering up of infringing material. The plaintiff is a corporation registered in Japan. Defendant No.1 Mr. Biju is the proprietor of defendant No.2 Benz Auto Spares. The plaintiff claims to be the sixth largest industrial corporation in the world engaged in manufacture and sale of automobiles and auto-parts and is amongst Fortune Global 500 Companies. The plaintiff claims to have coined the trademark TOYOTA which has no meaning in India nor is a dictionary word or a word of any trade or usage. It is alleged that the trademark TOYOTA is being used by the plaintiff in India since 1957 in relation to vehicles, their parts and fittings. It is also alleged that on account of the quality of the products, which are being sold under the name TOYOTA and continuous use of the aforesaid trademark, it has acquired an enviable reputation and goodwill in the market. The trademark TOYOTA is registered in the name of the plaintiff company in the following classes:

S. No.TrademarkRegistration/ Application No.ClassStatus
1.TOYOTA50669512Registered and renewed upto 09.03.2013
2.TOYOTA50669005

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top