Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Aktiebolaget Volvo – Appellant
Versus
S. Sura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought by plaintiffs against alleged infringement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial history and procedural background of the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. ownership and registration of the trademark 'volvo'. (Para 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. evidence of trademark infringement and passing off. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. court's findings on issues of infringement. (Para 27 , 31 , 32 , 38) |
| 6. final decree on the suit. (Para 33 , 39) |
| 7. cost awarded to successful plaintiffs. (Para 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J.
1. This Suit has been filed by the plaintiffs, originally against 12 defendants praying, for the following reliefs:
"i) An order for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their principal officers, partners, servants, representatives and agents or any of them, from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, exporting, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in buses or any other products and services under the trademark VOLVO, VOIVO, VCLVC or any other mark deceptively similar thereto or using the trademark VOLVO in any other manner so as to infringe the Plaintiffs' registered trademark VOLVO;
ii) An order for permanent injunction restr
The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in a trademark infringement suit where the defendant manufactured 'lookalike' buses featuring the plaintiff's registered, well-known 'grille-slash'....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to grant a summary judgment in cases where the defendant has no real prospects of successfully defending the claim and fails ....
Infringement of well-known trademarks under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the grant of permanent injunction and damages as remedies.
The court affirmed the validity of the plaintiffs' trademarks 'PENTA' and 'VOLVO PENTA', granting a permanent injunction against the defendants for infringement and passing off, emphasizing the marks....
The court affirmed the registered trademark holder's rights against similar marks and clarified standards for proving prior use and confusion under trademark law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
