SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUNIL GAUR
R.S. Kalra – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Assistant/Sdm, Hauz Khas – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sunil Kumar, J.

1. The question of law raised in the above captioned two petitions is of non-applicability of Delhi Land Reforms Act to urbanised village.

2. This question of law stands answered by Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.4143/2003, Smt. Indu Khorana vs. Gram Sabha & Ors. rendered on 26th March, 2010, in the following words:

    "We thus hold that once rural areas is urbanized by issuance of notification under section 507(a) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, provisions of Delhi Reforms Act will cease to apply."

3. Learned counsel for the respondents concedes the aforesaid legal position. Resultantly, impugned orders of 9th April, 2002 in W.P.(C) No.6768/2003 and of 10th October, 1991 in W.P.(C) No 7305/2003 in the above two captioned petitions holding to the contrary, thus cannot be sustained.

4. Accordingly, both these petitions are allowed while setting aside the impugned orders therein, with no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top