SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUNIL GAUR
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Sheo Raj – Respondent


ORDER

Sunil Guar, J.

C.M. No. 4262/2011 (under Section 151 CPC) in LA. App. No.655/2010.

1. By this application, appellant seeks permission to place on record the certified copy of the impugned judgment and the correspondence (Annexure A/3 to Annexure A/7) to justify the delay occasioned in filing the accompanying appeal.

2. Without commenting upon the veracity of the aforesaid correspondence, as the same would be subject matter of the consideration in the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, certified copy of the impugned judgment (Annexure A1/2) as well as Copy of correspondence (Annexure A-3 to Annexure A-7) filed alongwith this application is taken on record.

3. Application stands disposed of.

C.M. No.11018/2010 (under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 479 days) & LA. App. No.655/2010

1. The delay in filing the accompanying appeal is of 479 days which was occasioned due to time consuming process of obtaining legal opinion to file the appeal against the impugned judgment and much time was consumed in obtaining sanction for purchasing Court fee of Rs.51,36,592/-. This is what is urged by Mr.Sanjay Poddar, learned senior coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top