Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VED PRAKASH VAISH
Moti Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Secretary General, Supreme Court of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ved Prakash Vaish, J. (Oral)--By way of present petition the petitioner prays for appointment to the post of Junior Court Assistant in the Registry of the Supreme Court of India.
2. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent invited applications for the post of Junior Court Assistant in the Registry of Supreme Court of India vide advertisement dated 31.10.2012. The eligible candidates were required to appear for the written test, typing test on computer followed by the interview before the Interview Board.
3. The petitioner along with other eligible candidates appeared for the written test held on 15th June, 2015. She was declared successful and was awarded 51 marks out of 100 marks. In the objective type computer knowledge written test the petitioner secured 15 marks out of 25 marks. The respondent shortlisted 1175 candidates for appearing in interview. The petitioner along with other successful candidates appeared for interview and out of 1175 candidates 500 were declared successful. The petitioner's name did not figure in the list of 500 successful candidates. In the interview, the petitioner was awarded 6 marks out of 25 marks.
4. Mr. N.K. S
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
