IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Gita Mittal, C. Hari Shankar, JJ.
Nipun Malhotra - Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9643 of 2017, CM Nos. 39251 of 2017, 12571 & 14652 of 2018 and W.P.(C) 5142 of 2018
Decided On : 01-06-2018
ORDER
1. In view of our order dated 1st June, 2018, we are hereunder recording our reasons for continuation of the assurance made by Mr. Anand Grover, ld. Senior Counsel on 14th May, 2018 and prohibiting the respondents from acquiring standard floor buses.
2. In the training programme, conducted by the Delhi High Court, on 12th and 13th July, 2014, captioned as "Making court room practices responsive towards victims of sexual offences", one of the resource persons in the session on Laxmi Narayan Tripathi, a six feet plus transgender activist, while leading a training session of 60 judges, 20 prosecutors, 40 police officials and 20 legal aid lawyers at the District Courts, Saket, stood before them and asked the following poignant question:
"Am I invisible?"
3. There was stunned silence in the room as keeping in view of Laxmi's vibrant personality, the answer was so obvious. Laxmi had to repeat the question multiple times before there was a roar of a negative response. What Laxmi stated thereafter sums up exactly what specially-abled people in Delhi in the present case, must be experiencing. Laxmi Narayan Tripathi, then asked all the legally trained minds in the room:
"Then why do you treat me so?"
This is the very question which the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 on wheelchairs before us are asking of the respondents before us. Why are they being treated as invisible and non-existent despite the Constitutional recognition of their rights as well as the statutory provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016 ensuring equality and non-discrimination to the differently-abled?
Background facts
4. Certain background facts first. W.P.(C) No. 9643/2017 was filed by Mr. Nipun Malhotra (petitioner no.1), who has severe locomotor disability from birth, called "arthrogryposis", which is a medical condition which leads to a lack of muscles in his arms and legs and renders him permanently dependant on a wheelchair for basic mobility. Despite the limitation from this medical condition, the petitioner no.1 along with his mother Mrs. Priyanka Malhotra has set up the Nipman Foundation which is actively involved in the field of disability rights.
5. The writ petition assails the Cabinet Decision No.2503 & 2504 taken on 1st September, 2017 for acquisition of standard floor buses which were to be rolled out within one year depriving numerous persons with disabilities residing in Delhi, as well as ousting senior citizens, from access to public transport. We reproduce these decisions hereafter:
"GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
(CO-ORDINATION BRANCH)
DELHI SECRETARIAT, I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI
No. F.3/32017/GAD/CN/
Dated: 04.09.2017
CABINET DECISION NO. 2503 DATED 01/09/2017
Subject: Engagement of 1000 Fully Built CNG Propelled Standard Size Buses with 900 mm floor height through Private Entities in Cluster No. 13,16 and 14(partial) by the Transport Department.
Decision: The Council of Ministers considered the note of Secretary (Transport) and approved the proposal contained in para-7 of the cabinet note with the direction that the roll out will begin within 06 months and be completed within 10 months.
--Sd/--
(Dr. M.M. Kutty)
Secretary to the Cabinet
Dated: 04.09.2017
No. F.3/3/2017/GAD/CN"
"GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
(CO-ORDINATION BRANCH)
DELHI SECRETARIAT, I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI
No. F.3/32017/GAD/CN/
Dated: 04.09.2017
CABINET DECISION NO. 2504 DATED 01/09/2017
Subject: Procurement of 1000 Fully built Non-AC CNG propelled standard size buses with standard floor height of 900 mm by DTC without AMC from Vehicle Manufacturers.
Decision: The Council of Ministers considered the note of Secretary (Transport) and approved the proposal contained in para-7 of the cabinet note with the direction that the roll out will begin within 08 months and be completed within 12 months.
--Sd/--
(Dr. M.M.Kutty)
Secretary to the Cabinet
Dated: 04.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.