Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Nitesh – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. NCT of Delhi) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of fir upon settlement of disputes (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. court's inclination to quash fir based on settled matters (Para 9) |
| 3. ratio for quashing the fir stated (Para 10) |
| 4. final decision to allow and dispose of the petition (Para 11 , 12) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
CRL. M.A. 1618/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.317/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.159/2013 dated 27.03.2013, registered at PS - Pandav Nagar, and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent Nos. 2 to 7 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Respondent Nos.2 to 7 are personally present in Court through video conferencing with their counsel and they have been identified by SI Neeraj/IO and submits that matter
Amicable settlements between parties can result in the quashing of FIRs when all parties express no desire to continue prosecution.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
The court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and do not wish to prosecute further, as continued prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
The court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and do not wish to pursue prosecution, ensuring judicial efficiency.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the victim expresses no desire to proceed with prosecution, as continuing would serve no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties can warrant quashing an FIR, prioritizing judicial efficiency when no further prosecution is deemed necessary.
The court validated the quashing of an FIR based on the parties' amicable settlement, indicating that prosecution lacks utility when disputes are resolved.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties amicably settle their disputes, affirming the principle that prosecution continues only when necessary.
Quashing of an FIR is justified when parties settle their disputes amicably and express no wish to continue prosecution.
The court can quash an FIR if parties reach an amicable settlement and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
