Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Mohan Singh Chamola – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
CRL. M.A. 8949/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL. M.A. 8950-51/2021 (exemption)
3. Applications are allowed with direction to file attested affidavit within four weeks of courts resuming normal functioning.
4. Applications are disposed of.
CRL.M.C.1411/2021
5. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.204/2020, registered at PS - Roop Nagar, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
6. Notice issued.
7. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by counsel for respondent no.2 and respondent no.3 in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
8. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent nos.2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.
9. Respondent nos.2 and 3 are personally present in Court through video conferencing and they have been identified by IO SI Ranjeet and submits that matter has been settled and they do not wish t
The High Court can quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainants express a desire not to proceed with prosecution.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
Amicable settlements between parties can lead to the quashing of FIRs when further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court can quash an FIR if parties reach an amicable settlement and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court validated the quashing of an FIR based on the parties' amicable settlement, indicating that prosecution lacks utility when disputes are resolved.
An amicable settlement between parties is a valid ground to quash an FIR when no useful purpose would be served in pursuing prosecution.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the victim expresses no desire to proceed with prosecution, as continuing would serve no useful purpose.
Quashing of FIR is permissible when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to proceed with prosecution.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties amicably settle their disputes, affirming the principle that prosecution continues only when necessary.
Amicable settlements between parties provide a valid basis for quashing FIRs when further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
