Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Sanjeev Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi at Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural aspects of hearing conducted via video conferencing. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. settlement of disputes leads to fir quashing. (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court quashes fir based on effective settlement. (Para 9) |
| 4. quashing fir is justified to prevent futility. (Para 10) |
| 5. final order allows the petition and disposes applications. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
Crl.M.A.2376/2021 (exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C.446/2021 & Crl.M.A.2375/2021 (stay)
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 0208/2019, registered at PS - Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in Court through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed
Quashing of FIR is permissible when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to proceed with prosecution.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the victim expresses no desire to proceed with prosecution, as continuing would serve no useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties may warrant the quashing of FIRs when no further prosecution is desired, underscoring the judicial support for resolving disputes outside court.
Amicable settlements between parties can warrant quashing an FIR, prioritizing judicial efficiency when no further prosecution is deemed necessary.
Criminal proceedings may be quashed when parties amicably settle disputes and indicate they do not wish to pursue prosecution, aligning with principles of judicial efficiency and public interest.
The High Court can quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainants express a desire not to proceed with prosecution.
Court can quash FIR when parties have reached an amicable settlement, as continuation serves no useful purpose.
An amicable settlement between parties is a valid ground to quash an FIR when no useful purpose would be served in pursuing prosecution.
A court has the authority to quash an FIR when parties have reached an amicable settlement and continuation of prosecution serves no useful purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
