Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Nidhi Malik – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request to set aside an order. (Para 1) |
| 2. liberty granted to pursue a fresh application. (Para 2 , 6) |
| 3. notice accepted; no counter affidavit filed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. direction to respond to second representation. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. order to be uploaded and communicated. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.
C.M.No.34066/2020
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.10874/2020
1. Present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"1. Allow the present Petition and pass an appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside the Impugned Order dated 01.12.2020 passed by the Ld. Central Administrative, Principal bench, New Delhi in MA/100/2252/2020;
2. Consequently, direct that the prayer (s) made in the Original Application of the Petitioner as filed before the Ld. CAT, Principal bench, New Delhi be allowed;
3. Consequently, direct the Respondent no. 1 to grant No objection/approval to the Petitioner for transfer of her cadre from West Bengal cadre to AGMUT Cadre and accordingly direct for passing of relieving orders in favour of
Judicial oversight ensures administrative delays do not impede new transfer requests, allowing prompt decisions on applications submitted within justifiable timelines.
Dismissal of original application on the ground of limitation does not prevent the disposal of the petitioner's second representation.
The court emphasized the necessity for the State to comply with established precedents regarding cadre transfers, mandating the issuance of a No Objection Certificate for the respondent.
Point of Law : when an order made for the benefit of a party is disregarded or violated and the Court enforces the order by punishing the delinquent for contempt, it is said that such proceedings is ....
Timely decision-making by the respondents on the petitioner's representation and conditions for satisfaction of the petitioner's grievance are crucial in service transfer matters.
Court requires substantiated grounds for denying inter-cadre transfer requests based on officer shortages, aligning with administrative rules.
Prompt decision on representation and communication of reasoned order by the respondents.
Transfer orders in public administration are justified unless proven to be mala fide, unlawful, or against established statutory provisions; no absolute right for an employee to remain in one postal ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
