IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Ved Bhushan Bhatia - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 68 of 2020
Decided On : 19-01-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for quashing of fir based on settlement deed. (Para 1) |
| 2. details of fir registration and identification of complainant. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. amicable resolution between parties. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's inclination to quash fir due to resolution. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final order allowing the petition and quashing fir. (Para 13 , 14) |
CRL.M.A. 810/2021
1. By the present application, respondent No.2/complainant is seeking to place on record Settlement Deed executed on 13.01.2021 with petitioners and is praying for quashing of FIR, which is subject matter of main petition.
2. Notice.
3. Mr. Tarun Sharma, learned counsel representing petitioner and Mr.G.M.Farooqui, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State, accept notice.
4. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and in view of copy of Settlement Deed dated 13.01.2021 placed on record, the main petition is set down for hearing. The date of 09.05.2021 fixed in the petition is accordingly recalled.
5. The application is accordingly disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 68/2020
6. The subject matter of this petition pertains to FIR No.29/2017, under Sections 279 & 337 IPC, registered at police station Maurya Enclave, North West District, Delhi.
7. Mr. G.M.Farooqui, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits that respondent No.2 is present in the Court and he has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.
8. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.
9. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably resolved the subject matter of this petition in terms of Settlement Deed dated 13.01.2021.
10. Learned counsel for respondent No.2/complainant on instructions affirms that the terms of Settlement Deed dated 13.01.2021 have already been acted upon and respondent No.2 has no objection if the proceedings arising out of FIR in question are brought to an end.
11. Keeping in view that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in question, as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the proceedings arising out of the present FIR.
12. For the reasons afore noted, FIR No.29/2017, registered at police station Maurya Enclave, North West District, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
13. The petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
14. The order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith.
An FIR can be quashed based on an amicable resolution between parties, provided the complainant indicates no objection to terminating proceedings.
The court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably resolved the subject matter and no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the proceedings.
An FIR can be quashed if parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to pursue prosecution further.
Amicable settlements between parties can lead to quashing of FIRs under Section 482, emphasizing discontinuation of proceedings when no useful purpose is served.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR when prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Judicial discretion allows quashing of FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Amicable resolution of a dispute between parties, affirmed by the complainant, can lead to the quashing of an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
When disputes between parties are amicably settled, and the aggrieved party consents, criminal proceedings may be quashed for lack of utility.
Quashing of FIR is appropriate when disputes between the parties are resolved amicably, and continuation of proceedings serves no useful purpose.
A court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the prosecution.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.