Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Ankit @ Jai Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing fir due to settlement. (Para 3 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. court's inclination based on facts. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. order of the court and disposal. (Para 12 , 13) |
CRL. M.A.872/2021
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.173/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.1329/2017, dated 05.11.2017 registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi, and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by learned counsel for respondent No.2 present in the Court through video conferencing and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.
6. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing.
7. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
8. Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and she has been identified by SI Anju/IO and submits t
An FIR can be quashed if parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to pursue prosecution further.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR when prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the victim expresses no desire to proceed with prosecution, as continuing would serve no useful purpose.
A court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the prosecution.
Parties may quash an FIR when they reach an amicable settlement and the aggrieved party does not wish to pursue prosecution, promoting judicial efficiency.
Judicial discretion allows quashing of FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Court can quash FIR when parties amicably settle disputes, confirming that further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
Criminal proceedings may be quashed when parties amicably settle disputes and indicate they do not wish to pursue prosecution, aligning with principles of judicial efficiency and public interest.
When disputes between parties are amicably settled, and the aggrieved party consents, criminal proceedings may be quashed for lack of utility.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
