DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition is allowed and disposed. (Para 1 , 2 , 11) |
| 2. petitioner requests to quash fir due to settlement. (Para 3 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's considerations on the settlement and prosecution. (Para 4 , 5 , 7 , 9) |
| 4. court quashes the fir and proceedings. (Para 10) |
Crl. M.A. 5376/2021 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 1052/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 294/2017, registered at PS - Malviya Nagar, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by learned counsel for respondent no.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
7. Respondent no.2 is personally present in Court through video conference with her counsel and they have been identified by SI Suraj/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the ma
A court can quash an FIR if the parties have amicably settled their disputes and no useful purpose would be served by continuing with the prosecution.
Parties may quash an FIR when they reach an amicable settlement and the aggrieved party does not wish to pursue prosecution, promoting judicial efficiency.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have settled the dispute amicably and the victim expresses no desire to proceed with prosecution, as continuing would serve no useful purpose.
Court can quash FIR when parties amicably settle disputes, confirming that further prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The High Court can quash an FIR when parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainants express a desire not to proceed with prosecution.
An FIR can be quashed if parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to pursue prosecution further.
In cases of amicable settlement, a victim's consent to discontinue prosecution justifies quashing the FIR in the interest of justice.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of an FIR when prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Criminal proceedings may be quashed when parties amicably settle disputes and indicate they do not wish to pursue prosecution, aligning with principles of judicial efficiency and public interest.
Quashing of an FIR is warranted when parties have settled their disputes and the victim does not wish to prosecute further.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.