SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Niranjan Jain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of fir due to amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. court's inclination to quash fir based on resolution. (Para 3 , 4 , 7)
3. fir quashed and proceedings dismissed. (Para 8)
4. conclusion and final disposition of the petition. (Para 9 , 10)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. By this petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.100/2017, registered at police station Shahdara, Delhi.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State, accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, who is the complainant of FIR in question, is present and he has been duly identified by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.

4. With the consent of both the sides, the present petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

5. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that parties are distantly related to each other but due to some misunderstanding, the FIR in question was registered and several civil disputes arose amongst the parties and third parties. However, with the intervention of well wishers and common relatives, the dispute between the parties has been resolved in terms of Memo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top