IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Karan Singh Rathore - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 1432 of 2020, W.P.(C) 2360 of 2020, W.P.(C) 2673 of 2020 and W.P.(C) 932 of 2021 & CM Appl. 2542 of 2021
Decided On : 25-01-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for pro rata pension based on similar cases. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. right to verification and appeal noted. (Para 3) |
| 3. order to grant pension if eligible. (Para 4) |
| 4. interest on delayed pension payments. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
C.M.No.2586/2021 in W.P.(C) No.1432/2020
C.M.No.2579/2021 in W.P.(C) No.2360/2020
C.M.No.2587/2021 in W.P.(C) No.2673/2020
W.P.(C) No.932/2021 & C.M.No.2542/2021
Keeping in view the averments in the applications, early hearing is allowed and with consent of parties, the matters are taken up for hearing today.
Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.1432/2020
W.P.(C) No.2360/2020
W.P.(C) No.2673/2020
W.P.(C) No.932/2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners in this petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificated (NOC) had been given.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.
4. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.
5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
Court mandates compliance with precedents granting pro rata pensions, requiring verification of petitioners' eligibility and stipulating interest on delayed payments.
The court determines the eligibility for pro rata pensions based on prior judgments and mandates verification of petitioners' claims, ensuring equitable treatment.
The court affirmed the entitlement to pro rata pension based on equality principles, mandating timely verification by the Indian Air Force.
Equal treatment in pension matters for similarly situated individuals, establishing entitlement to pro rata pension based on previous case law.
Right to equal treatment in pension matters ensures that similarly situated individuals receive equivalent benefits, reinforced by prior decisions.
The court mandates the verification of petitioners' eligibility for pro rata pension linked to prior cases, ensuring timely communication of denials and the obligation to pay interest on delays.
The court emphasized the principle of equal treatment for similarly situated individuals regarding pension entitlements, mandating verification by the Indian Air Force based on established precedents....
Petitioners similarly situated to previous claimants are entitled to pro rata pension, with interest on delayed payments, and must be informed in writing if found otherwise.
The court held that petitioners in similar circumstances are entitled to equal treatment in terms of pension, with the requirement for timely verification and communication of rights.
The court affirmed the right to equal treatment in pension claims, requiring verification of eligibility related to prior judgments while ensuring the petitioner can appeal if denied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.