SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Binit Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 8341 of 2019
Decided On : 27-01-2021




The court affirmed the entitlement to pro rata pension based on equality principles, mandating timely verification by the Indian Air Force.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Pro rata pension - Petitioner claims equality in benefits on the basis of being similarly placed as petitioners in relevant case laws - Directs Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension if eligibility is verified within twelve weeks. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Petition quietly disposed without any further appeal possibilities being compromised, ensuring procedural fairness regards verification of claims. (Paras 4-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought pro rata pension, claiming to be similarly situated as other petitioners who were granted relief in previous judgments.

Findings of Court:
Indian Air Force must verify eligibility for pro rata pension and respond accordingly within twelve weeks. Arrears to incur interest if not paid timely.

Issues: The primary issue was the claim for pro rata pension based on equality under the law. The need for verification of the petitioner’s eligibility was also highlighted.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the principle of equality in benefit provision under similar circumstances, emphasizing the need for due process in verification and communication of decisions related to pension entitlement.

Result: Petition disposed of as directed.

Table of Content
1. hearing conducted via video conferencing. (Para 1)
2. petitioner seeks pro rata pension similar to previous cases. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. respondents directed to verify and grant pension within stipulated time. (Para 5 , 6)
4. order to be uploaded and communicated promptly. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM APPL.2709/2021

Keeping in view the averments in the application, early hearing is allowed and with consent of parties, the matter is taken up for hearing today.

Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

W.P. (C) 8341/2019

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top