SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
SLSV Rama Linga Sharma - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P. (C) 2531 of 2019
Decided On : 19-01-2021




Equal treatment in pension matters for similarly situated individuals, establishing entitlement to pro rata pension based on previous case law.

Headnote:(A) Union of India and connected judgments - Pro rata pension - Petitioner claimed entitlement to pro rata pension similar to other petitioners, with requisite No Objection Certificate given - Respondents directed to verify eligibility and grant relief accordingly. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Pension - Right to pro rata pension confirmed based on established precedents, with directions for arrears to be paid with interest if not settled in a twelve-week period. (Paras 5-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to be treated similarly as petitioners in earlier connected cases and claimed pro rata pension following discharge from the Indian Air Force.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner entitled to necessary pension in line with other resolved cases; liabilities outlined for untimely payments.

Issues: Whether the petitioner is similarly placed as prior petitioners for pension entitlement and the timeline for payment and potential interest on arrears was addressed.

Ratio Decidendi: Court affirmed entitlements based on previous judgments, upholding the principle of equal treatment in pension matters for similarly situated individuals.

Result: Petition disposed of favorably granting entitlement to pro rata pension.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for pro rata pension. (Para 1 , 2)
2. no objection certificate provided. (Para 3)
3. disposal of petition upon verification. (Para 4 , 5)
4. interest on delayed pension payments. (Para 6)
5. order to be communicated and uploaded. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

CM Appl. 1961/2021 (for early hearing)

Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and the matter is taken up for hearing today.

Consequently, present application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 2531/2019

1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions, 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner in this petition, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, is not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top