SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
DRT Bar Association Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India the Ministry of Finance – Respondent


Table of Content
1. grievances regarding it infrastructure for drt hearings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. status of funding and progress in it infrastructure setup. (Para 5 , 6)
3. directive to assess it requirements for drt. (Para 7)
4. report and next hearing scheduled. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Debt Revenue Tribunal (hereinafter, "DRT"), Bar Association, Delhi, raising grievances in respect of the video conferencing hearings which are being conducted at DRT.

3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that the IT infrastructure, which is required for conducting hearings is not being made available, thereby leading to disruption in the hearings and an erratic filing system, among other technical issues.

4. This Court has, from time to time, passed various orders in this petition. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has been impleaded in this matter vide order dated 29th June, 2020. The Court has also recorded, vide order dated 15th September, 2020, that video conferencing facilities are available, however, DRT has not been functioning properly.

5.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top