Back
HRISHIKESH ROY, S. V. N. BHATTI
Sarvesh Mathur – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General High Court Of Punjab And Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner does not wish to pursue writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. virtual participation essential for courts and tribunals. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. call for report on tribunal virtual hearing availability. (Para 5) |
| 4. information required within four weeks for further proceedings. (Para 6) |
ORDER :
Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 351/2023 [Item No. 31]
1. Mr. Sarvesh Mathur, petitioner-in-person submits that the provision for virtual participation is made available, in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. This is also the submission of Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
With the above, the petitioner-in-person submits that he does not wish to press this writ petition.
Noting the above submission, the matter stands dismissed as not pressed.
W.P.(C) No. 1239/2021 [Item No. 31.4]
Mr. Varun Thakur, learned counsel submits that as the matter has become infructuous, he has instruction to not to press this matter.
Noting the above submission, the petition stands dismissed, as not pressed.
W.P.(C) No. 941/2021, W.P.(C) No. 1051/2021 in W.P.(C) No. 1197/2021 AND W.P.(C) No. 254/2024
Mr. K. Parmeshwar and Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, learned Senior
The use of technology by the Bar and the Bench is no longer an option but a necessity, and access to courts must not be restricted based on technology usage.
Senior citizen lawyers have a right to request hybrid hearings for safety amidst the pandemic; courts must consider health and infrastructural concerns before resuming physical operations.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for vaccination arrangements for lawyers falling in specific categories and the formation of a committee by the Delhi High Court Bar As....
Virtual court proceedings can continue alongside physical hearings based on the preference of advocates, reflecting operational flexibility in court processes.
The court recognized the need for hybrid hearing arrangements and a vaccination mechanism for lawyers, emphasizing stakeholder consultation amid COVID-19 concerns.
The main legal point established is the importance of adapting to technological advancements in the justice system, particularly the use of video conferencing for court proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
