SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1739

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Anil Kumar Hajelay – Appellant
Versus
Honble High Court Of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Atul T.N., Advocate, Anil Kumar Hajelay, Advocate, Sagar Pathak, Advocate, Devendra Verma, Advocate, Shreya Arneja, Advocate, Rajat Gautam, Advocate, Viraj R Datar, Advocate, Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate, Shikher Sheel, Advocate, Ayushi Bansal, Advocate, Naginder Benipal, Advocate, Kirtiman Singh, Advocate, Waize Ali Noor, Advocate, Ramesh Gupta, Advocate, Rajiv Khosla, Advocate, Ajayinder Sangwan, Advocate, Ramji Srinivasan, Advocate, Geeta Luthra, Advocate, Manish Vashisht, Advocate, Amitabh Chaturvedi, Advocate, Jeevesh Nagrath, Advocate, Rikky Gupta, Advocate, Urvi Kapoor, Advocate, Sangeeth Mohan, Advocate, Ankit Monga, Advocate, Chetan Sharma, Advocate, Anil Soni, Advocate, Amit Gupta, Advocate, Vinay Yadav, Advocate, Akshay Gadeock, Advocate, Sahaj Garg, Advocate, R. Venkat Prabhat, Advocate, Shadan Farasat, Advocate, Tanvi Tuhina, Advocate, Mohit Mathur, Advocate, Sudhanshu Batra, Advocate, Abhijat, Advocate, Jatan Singh, Advocate, Amit Saxena, Advocate, B.S. Dhir, Advocate, Kajal Chandra, Advocate, Rupali Kapoor, Advocate, Kanika Singh, Advocate, Nikhil Mehta, Advocate, Dhan Mohan, Advocate, Shashwat Jindal, Advocate, Arpit Kumar Singh, Advocate, Harshit Jain, Advocate, Mohit Gupta, Advocate, Vikas Singh, Advocate, Yogesh Swaroop, Advocate, Amarjit Singh Chandiok, Advocate, Sweta Kakkad, Advocate, Neelam Deol, Advocate, Ajayinder Sangwan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. - This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. The Petitioners in WP(C)2018/2021 are practising lawyers who are all Senior citizens. The prayer in the petition is that the Subordinate Courts and Quasi-Judicial bodies in Delhi ought to be directed to hold hybrid hearings, once physical courts are opened, as there are several counsels who suffer from co-morbidities and are unable to appear before the Court due to the threat of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Petitioners also submit that adverse orders are being passed by the subordinate courts if the lawyers do not appear physically and therefore enormous prejudice is being caused. On 16th February 2021, a report was called for from the worthy Registrar General as to availability of infrastructure in the subordinate courts including availability of internet connectivity, both in the court premises and the residences of the judicial officers. A report has been submitted by the Registrar General. The report overall suggests that hybrid hearings are not fully possible in the district courts at this stage as there are several infrastructural issues.

3. In W.P.(C) 2673/2021, the Petition has been filed

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
        whatsapp-icon Back to top