Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, ASHA MENON
Surendra Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
22. CM APPL. 4385/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1531/2021
28. CM APPL. 4532/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1595/2021
30. CM APPL. 4587/2021 (Exemption) in W.P. (C) 1605/2021
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.
18. CM APPL. 4502/2021 (Early hearing) in W.P. (C) 9905/2019
20. CM APPL. 4534/2021 (Early hearing) in W.P. (C) 2024/2020
Keeping in view the averments made in the applications, the same are allowed and the petitions are taken up for hearing today.
Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.
W.P. (C) 9905/2019
W.P. (C) 2024/2020
W.P. (C) 1531/2021
W.P. (C) 1595/2021
W.P. (C) 1605/2021
W.P. (C) 1256/2020
1. These petitions have been heard by way of video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others connected petitions 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019]
Petitioners similarly placed to others are entitled to pro rata pension; respondents must verify and respond accordingly.
The court affirmed the right to equality under Article 14, directing that a petitioner similarly situated to prior cases be granted pro rata pension, ensuring fair administrative practice in verifica....
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for eligible petitioners, ensuring compliance with equal treatment principles and due verification standards from prior judgments.
The court mandated verification of petitioners' entitlements to pro rata pension based on precedents, with interest on late payments.
The court determines the eligibility for pro rata pensions based on prior judgments and mandates verification of petitioners' claims, ensuring equitable treatment.
The court directed the payment of pro rata pension to the petitioner if found similarly situated as in prior decisions, establishing the principle of equality and fair treatment under law.
The court affirmed the right to pro rata pension for similarly situated individuals, emphasizing the requirement of verification and timely payment of entitlements.
The court affirmed the entitlement to pro rata pension based on equality principles, mandating timely verification by the Indian Air Force.
The court establishes that pension claims must be assessed based on established precedents ensuring equity and mandated timelines for verification and payment.
The court mandates that if the petitioner is similarly placed as in prior judgements, pro-rata pension must be granted, reinforcing the obligation for verification and timely communication regarding ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
