SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Yashpal Vats – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioners seek to quash fir. (Para 3)
2. settlement between the parties. (Para 6 , 7)
3. complainant does not wish to prosecute. (Para 8)
4. court's inclination to quash fir. (Para 9)
5. fir and proceedings quashed. (Para 10)
6. petition allowed and disposed. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

Crl. M.A. 2444/2021

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.468/2021

3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.296/2017 dated 13.09.2017 registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 15.04.2015 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 08.08.2016.

7. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 with the interventio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top