SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Manohar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. introduction of the case and nature of fir. (Para 1 , 2)
2. resolution of fir through settlement and marriage. (Para 3 , 6 , 8)
3. court's analysis and willingness to quash fir. (Para 4 , 5 , 9)
4. court's decision to quash the fir. (Para 10)
5. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 130/2012, u/s 363 IPC, registered at police station Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi in this petition.

2. The FIR in question was registered at the instance of respondent No.2 against the petitioner, who is grandfather of the prosecutrix.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 07.02.2013 reached through Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. It is submitted by learned counsel that marriage between petitioner and prosecutrix/Shalu, granddaughter of respondent No.2, was solemnized on 04.05.2012 and since then they are happily living together as husband and wife.

4. Notice issued.

5. Mr. Amit Chahda, learned Additional Public Pros

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top