SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
National Insurance Company Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Amir Hassan - Respondent
MAC.APP. 262 of 2020 & CM Appln. 32271 of 2020
Decided On : 10-02-2021




Separate compensation for 'Loss of Love and Affection' is impermissible, as it is included within 'Loss of Consortium', as established in Supreme Court precedents.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Compensation - Award under the head 'Loss of Love and Affection' - Court ruled in accordance with the Supreme Court judgment in 'United India Insurance Company vs. Satinder Kaur' that such compensation cannot be awarded separately from 'Loss of Consortium'. (Paras 3-6)

(B) Legal principles - 'Loss of Consortium' encompasses spousal, parental, and filial elements, making 'Loss of Love and Affection' redundant as a separate compensation head. (Paras 5-6)

(C) Appeal - The appeal is allowed, and the Tribunal's award under 'Loss of Love and Affection' is deleted, while the remainder of the award is upheld. (Paras 7-8)

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenged the Tribunal's decision that awarded compensation to the respondents under both 'Loss of Consortium' and 'Loss of Love and Affection'. (Paras 1-6)

Findings of Court:
The appeal was accepted in part, modifying the award to remove duplicate compensation while upholding the rest of the decision. (Paras 7-8)

Issues: The main issue was whether separate compensation could be awarded for 'Loss of Love and Affection' in addition to 'Loss of Consortium'. (Paras 2-4)

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the Supreme Court's clarification that 'Loss of Love and Affection' is included within 'Loss of Consortium' and should not be compensated separately. (Para 5)

Result: Appeal allowed; award modified.

Table of Content
1. details of the case and compensation awarded. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding the 'loss of love and affection' compensation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. supreme court ruling on compensation principles. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court's final decision and order. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. Appellant impugns judgment dated 02.12.2019 whereby the claim petition filed by respondent nos. 1 to 5 was allowed and compensation awarded.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant contends that the only issue arising in the present appeal is with regard to award of compensation under the head of `Loss of Love and Affection'.

3. Learned counsel submits that in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court dated 30th June, 2020 in `United India Insurance Company Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur', (Civil Appeal No.2705/2020) no separate compensation could have been made awarded the head of `Loss of Love and Affection' in addition to award of compensation under the head of `Loss of Consortium'.

4. Learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 5 concedes to the said position and submits that he has no objection in case the award is modified and the award of compensation under the head `Loss of Love and Affection' is deleted.

5. The Supreme Court in United India Insurance Company Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur (Supra) relying upon Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Nanu Ram & Ors., (2018) 18 SCC 130 has held that consortium includes spousal consortium, parental consortium, as well as filial consortium. Loss of love and affection is comprehended in loss of consortium. The Supreme Court directed that the Tribunals and High Courts to award compensation for loss of consortium, which is a legitimate conventional head and held that there was no justification to award compensation towards loss of love and affection as a separate head.

6. In the present case, the Tribunal has awarded separately under the head `loss of consortium' and `loss of love and affection', which could not have been done.

7. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed to the said extent. Award dated 02.12.2019 is modified and compensation awarded under the head `Loss of Love and Affection' is accordingly deleted.

8. Since there is no challenge to the remaining award, rest of the award is consequently upheld.

9. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the compensation amount has already been attached in execution proceedings and deposited with the Tribunal.

10. Tribunal shall disburse the awarded amount, minus the compensation awarded under the head `Loss of Love and Affection' and its interest component, in terms of the scheme of disbursal stipulated in the award.

11. Balance amount, if any Tribunal shall be refund to the appellant.

12. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.

13. Copy of the order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email by the Court Master.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top