IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Naveen Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 554 of 2021
Decided On : 24-02-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion and disposal of application (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 11) |
| 2. quashing fir due to settlement (Para 3 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's rationale for quashing fir (Para 9 , 10) |
Crl. M.A. 2778/2021 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is disposed of.
CRL.M.C.554/2021
3. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.230/2018, registered at Police Station Saket, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4. Notice issued.
5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6. Petitioner no.2 and respondent no.2 got married on 17.04.2005. Two children (one boy and one girl) were born out of the said wedlock. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioner no.2 and respondent no.2, they started living separately since 2015.
7. Petitioner no.2 and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement dated 27.01.2020 before the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
8. Complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person and has been identified by WSI Nitesh of Police Station Saket and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.
10. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.230/2018, registered at Police Station Saket, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
11. The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
Amicable settlements between parties can lead to the quashing of FIRs under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code when no further prosecution serves a useful purpose.
Court can quash FIR if parties reach amicable settlement and complainant wishes not to pursue charges, indicating no useful purpose in prosecution.
Quashing of FIR is justified when parties settle amicably and the complainant chooses not to pursue the prosecution, emphasizing the importance of the complainant's consent in criminal proceedings.
The court can quash an FIR when parties amicably settle their disputes and express a desire not to pursue the prosecution.
The court can quash an FIR when both parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to proceed with prosecution.
An FIR can be quashed when the parties reach an amicable settlement and express no intent to prosecute further, as it serves no useful purpose to continue legal proceedings.
An FIR can be quashed if both parties have entered into a mutually agreed settlement and the complainant no longer wishes to pursue the case, demonstrating that prosecution serves no useful purpose.
A court can quash an FIR if the parties have reached an amicable settlement and the complainant no longer wishes to prosecute the matter, indicating no useful purpose in continuing proceedings.
Amicable settlements in family disputes can lead to quashing of FIRs when the parties express a desire to discontinue prosecution, emphasizing judicial economy and the significance of resolving confl....
Parties can amicably settle disputes, and such settlements justify quashing of FIRs, especially in cases stemming from personal issues.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.