Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Mohd. Usman – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. amicable resolution and settlement terms (Para 1 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. consent to proceed with final hearing (Para 4) |
| 3. court's inclination to quash fir (Para 9) |
| 4. quashing of fir based on resolutions (Para 10) |
| 5. final order allowing petition and disposing of application (Para 11 , 12) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 441/2020, under Sections 288/304A/34 IPC, registered at police station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought by petitioners.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits that on 23.10.2020 during construction of a house property, two persons got injured. One of the injured succumbed to the injuries and the other, sustained simple injuries on his face. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State further submits that respondents No.2 and 3 are parents of the deceased and respondent No.4 is the injured of the incident in question and they are present in the Court and have been identified by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in Court.
4. With the co
Amicable resolution of disputes can justify the quashing of FIRs when all parties involved affirm the terms of settlement, rendering further legal proceedings unnecessary.
The court has the discretion to quash FIR and consequent proceedings if the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved and the terms of the settlement have been complied with.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have resolved their disputes amicably, negating any purpose for prosecution.
An amicable settlement between parties is a valid ground to quash an FIR when no useful purpose would be served in pursuing prosecution.
An FIR can be quashed when parties amicably resolve their dispute and the complainant expresses a wish to withdraw, reinforced by imposed costs as a deterrent for future offenses.
Amicable settlements between parties may warrant the quashing of FIRs when no further prosecution is desired, underscoring the judicial support for resolving disputes outside court.
A quashing of FIR is permissible when parties have amicably resolved their dispute, promoting justice and restoring harmony.
A court may quash an FIR if the dispute between parties has been amicably resolved, rendering further proceedings unnecessary.
Amicable settlements between parties can justify the quashing of FIRs when prosecution serves no useful purpose.
Quash of FIR - Compromise/settlement of dispute - FIR quashed as no useful purpose would be served to continue proceedings
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
