SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Vinod Kumar Paswan alias Chirri – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 57/2021, under Sections 323/307/341/34 IPC, registered at police station Ashok Vihar, Delhi is sought by petitioners.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits that respondents No.2 is a minor and is represented through his father and respondent No.3 is the brother of respondent No.2. They are present through video conferencing and have been identified by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.

4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

5. On 04.02.2021 an altercation took place between the parties, which culminated into registration of FIR in question by respondent No.2. Both the parties are said to be residing in the same locality.

6. The present petition has been filed on the ground that with the intervention of residents of local persons, the parties have amicably resolved their dispute. It is stated that the parties have resolved their

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top