Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Ankit – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek quashing of fir. (Para 1) |
| 2. court observes presence of parties and settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 7) |
| 3. fir resolved by memorandum of understanding. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. fir quashed based on settlement. (Para 8) |
| 5. petition allowed and disposed. (Para 9 , 10) |
1. Petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No. 09/2021, under Section 279/337 IPC, registered at police station Paschim Vihar, New Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is the complainant of FIR in question and respondent No.3 is the driver of the vehicle and both are present through video conferencing and have been identified by the Investigating Officer, who is also present through video conferencing.
4. With the consent of both the sides, present petition has been taken up for final hearing and disposal.
5. Learned counsel appearing for petitioners submits that the subject matter of FIR stands amicably resolved between the parties in terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated 22.02.2021.
6. Respondents No. 2 & 3 ar
The court may quash an FIR when the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, and prosecution would not serve any useful purpose.
Resolution of disputes outside court can justify quashing FIRs when complainants express no intention to prosecute further.
The court can quash an FIR and consequent proceedings if the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved and continuing with the proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
An FIR can be quashed if parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant does not wish to pursue prosecution further.
An FIR can be quashed based on an amicable resolution between parties, provided the complainant indicates no objection to terminating proceedings.
A court may quash an FIR if the dispute between parties has been amicably resolved, rendering further proceedings unnecessary.
Criminal proceedings may be quashed when parties amicably settle disputes and indicate they do not wish to pursue prosecution, aligning with principles of judicial efficiency and public interest.
Judicial discretion allows quashing of FIR when parties reach an amicable settlement and prosecution serves no useful purpose.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have resolved their disputes amicably, negating any purpose for prosecution.
The court has the authority to quash FIRs when parties reach an amicable resolution, prioritizing justice and preventing unnecessary legal proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
