Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Vikrant Mani – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of fir no. 199/2019 under ipc. (Para 1) |
| 2. identification of complainant via video call. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's inclination to quash fir due to amicable resolution. (Para 4 , 7) |
| 4. parties resolved their dispute amicably. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. quashing of fir no. 199/2019 affirmed by the court. (Para 8) |
| 6. conclusion: petition allowed and order to be uploaded. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 199/2019, under Sections 279/338 IPC, registered at police station Vasant Kunj South, New Delhi is sought by petitioner.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conferencing and he has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.
4. With the consent of both the sides, the present petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.
5. The present petition has been filed on the ground that with the intervention of common friends and well
Resolution of disputes outside court can justify quashing FIRs when complainants express no intention to prosecute further.
The court can quash an FIR and consequent proceedings if the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved and continuing with the proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
The court may quash an FIR when the parties have resolved their disputes amicably, negating any purpose for prosecution.
Amicable resolution between parties via Memorandum of Understanding justifies quashing of FIR under IPC, as further prosecution serves no purpose.
The amicable resolution between the parties through a Compromise Deed can be a valid ground for quashing FIR and consequent proceedings.
The court may quash an FIR when the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, and prosecution would not serve any useful purpose.
Amicable settlements between parties can warrant quashing an FIR, prioritizing judicial efficiency when no further prosecution is deemed necessary.
The court held that amicable resolution of civil disputes justifies quashing of related criminal proceedings.
Criminal proceedings may be quashed when parties amicably settle disputes and indicate they do not wish to pursue prosecution, aligning with principles of judicial efficiency and public interest.
A quashing of FIR is permissible when parties have amicably resolved their dispute, promoting justice and restoring harmony.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
