SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, J.
Sunderjeet Singh - Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT of Delhi) - Respondent
Crl.M.C. 862 of 2021 & Crl.M.A. 4309 of 2021
Decided On : 15-03-2021




The court has the authority to quash FIRs when parties reach an amicable resolution, prioritizing justice and preventing unnecessary legal proceedings.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - FIR No. 1190/2014 was sought to be quashed as the dispute between the parties was resolved amicably following intervention by well-wishers, and the complainant affirmed he no longer wished to prosecute the matter - The court found no useful purpose in continuing the proceedings. (Paras 1, 5, 6, 8)

(B) Settlement of Disputes - Where parties reach an amicable resolution, the court may quash the FIR to prevent unnecessary prosecution, emphasizing the importance of resolving matters outside of court where possible. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR registered against them due to a misunderstanding that had been amicably resolved, as confirmed by the complainant present in court.

Findings of Court:
The court decided to quash the FIR and the consequent proceedings, noting that continuing with the matter served no purpose.

Issues: The main issue was whether the FIR could be quashed given the settlement between the parties.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that amicable resolution of disputes between parties allows for quashing FIRs, as it aligns with the principle of justice to avoid needless litigation.

Result: FIR No. 1190/2014 quashed.

Table of Content
1. quashing of fir due to resolved dispute (Para 1 , 5 , 6)
2. acceptance of notice and readiness for hearing (Para 3 , 4)
3. amicable resolution allows for fir quashing (Para 7)
4. formal quashing of fir and proceedings (Para 8)
5. final disposal of petition (Para 9)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. Vide this petition, quashing of FIR No. 1190/2014, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought by petitioners.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present in the Court and he has been identified as the complainant of FIR in question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present in the Court.

4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

5. It is submitted that due to some misunderstanding, a dispute arose between the parties, which resulted into registration of FIR by respondent No.2 However, with the intervention of elders and well wisher of parties, inter se dispute has been resolved.

6. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, has affirmed the factum of settlement with petitioners and has affirmed the contents of his affidavit filed in support of this petition. He submits that he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7. Keeping in view that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in question, as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the proceedings arising out of the present FIR.

8. For the reasons afore-noted, FIR No. 1190/2014, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

9. The petition and pending application are accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top