SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
C & C Constructions Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ircon International Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

CM No.8193/2021 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions and as per extant rules.

2. The application is disposed of.

FAO(OS) (COMM) No.36/2021

3. This appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 impugns the judgment/order dated 15th December, 2020 of the Commercial Division of this Court of dismissal of application of the appellant under Section 34 of the said Act.

4. The application under Section 34 of the Act, being OMP(COMM) No.566/2020, was filed with respect to arbitral award dated 21st December, 2019 (of three Arbitrators, with the appellant and the respondent having nominated one Arbitrator each and the third Arbitrator having been appointed by this Court) of dismissal, in exercise of powers under Section 16 of the Act, of all the claims of the appellant.

5. It is the contention of the counsel for the appellant that the Arbitral Tribunal, on an application under Section 16 of the Act having been preferred by the respondent, has summarily dismissed all the 15 monetary claims for recovery of compensation/damages, of the appellant against the respondent, with respect to the Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top