PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
RAITANI ENGINEERING WORKS PVT. LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA, J.
1. Heard Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned counsel representing the appellant as well as Mr. R. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. This is an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment dated 02.01.2019 passed by the learned District Judge, Kamrup (Metro) in Misc. (Arb.) Case No. 27/2013.
3. The respondent was given a contract to build a bridge in the Lumding-Silchar Gauge Conversion Project. The total value of the contract was Rs.17,48,23,500/-. The date of completion of the project was 06.12.2007.
4. The respondent claimed that it submitted the bridge drawing on 09.08.2007 for approval. On that day, the drawing of the box girder was also submitted. The respondent claimed that due to law and order situation in the period 2006 to 2008 in the N.C. Hills area, the entire construction works were affected. During that period, government failed to restore law and order and to stop militant activities. It was further claimed that one of its employees was hit by a stray bullet while he was travelling with railway officials and other personnel of another company. The employees of the respondent co
Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd. AIR 2003 SC 2629
Point of Law : Powers of the court U/S. 34 is limited and courts should not expand their own powers granted by the statute. Any such attempts by the courts while exercising their powers under S.34 of....
The judgment emphasizes the limited grounds for interference with arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, highlighting the need for restraint by courts while examini....
Clauses in contracts that prohibit claims for damages are against public policy and void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as they undermine the sanctity of contracts.
The court affirmed that the scope of interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is limited, and an arbitral award can only be set aside on specific grounds, not on broader ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.