SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Akash Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. quashing of fir based on amicable settlement (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's recognition of dispute resolution (Para 3 , 7)
3. final order to dispose of petition (Para 4 , 9)
4. confirmation of compromise by complainant (Para 5 , 6)
5. fir quashed due to settlement (Para 8)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Vide present petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No. 222/2013, which was initially registered for the offences under Sections 380/448/420/34 IPC at police station Farsh Bazar, Delhi but charge sheet in the said FIR has been filed for the offences under Sections 380/448/468/471/120B/34 IPC.

2. Quashing of the FIR in question has been sought on the ground that the dispute pertaining to property No. 4/2675-A, Gali No.6, Bihari Colony, Shahdara, between petitioners and respondent No.2, which led to registration of FIR in question and also various other litigations, has been amicably resolved between the parties.

3. Notice issued.

4. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conferencing and he has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top